* How did the philosophy of re-incarnation originate? It appears to have come from ancient myths, which stated that Kronos, or other names for Saturn, was a god who existed in one form and then experienced a flare-up followed by a somewhat different form from the previous one. And this occurred to Saturn a number of times over the centuries. The latter forms of Saturn appeared human-like, due to aurora-like phenomena, and that's when humans began to suppose that Saturn was their ancestor and creator. Since Saturn appeared to experience rebirth, some humans began to suppose that they would have similar rebirths.
* Saturn was initially very close above the Earth and, before it appeared to move away to its present orbit, it had a flare-up that caused great destruction on Earth. It seemed to the ancients by the destruction it wreaked, that Saturn was displeased with many tribes on Earth, so humans began warring against each other to please their god, Saturn. Saturn also appeared to give birth to numerous small star-like beings like itself and then it appeared to devour its own children, so humans on Earth began to imitate this by killing and devouring their own first-born children and practiced other types of human sacrifice, which still goes on secretly. The catastrophes caused by Saturn traumatized humanity, and humans learned to traumatize each new generation in similar ways by war and cruel parenting or schooling. This interpretation of ancient myths seems to be rather well proven and documented.
* Psychology has found that people tend to relive early traumatic experiences, until they remember the real cause of the trauma. Then, if they're not re-traumatized by denial, name-calling, or other abuse etc, they can mature emotionally and overcome the trauma and stop passing it on to new generations. So it's my feeling that humanity needs to remember the ancient myths via the collective unconscious, if possible, and come to understand how the trauma first started, so that we can mature emotionally past the tendency to repeat trauma through war and other cruelty.
lloyd's Blog
Sharing Concerns & Important Information
Posts: 38
No posts received thumbs up, next time you see a good one, give some respect and thumb it up.
Re: New Laws
September 30, 2009 by lloyd
HOW TO REDUCE GOVT
HOW TO HAVE EFFICIENT GOVERNMENT AGENCIES: A budgeting proposal
Herb - Dec 23rd, 2008 at 10:44 am - http://solari.com/blog/?p=1929
- There is a way to cut almost any state agency or department in half in about three years, with employees cooperating enthusiastically and willingly.
- Most government agencies propose their own budgets for each fiscal year, and each new one is almost always larger than the current budget. Most agencies make sure that the current year’s budget has been spent by the end of the fiscal year. They don’t want to lose their funding. There is no incentive for savings under this system.
- There should be a new budgeting policy for each department that would take any unspent, budgeted funds at the end of the fiscal year and split them among the people in the department. Then, the lower budget figure would be used for the next fiscal year, with, again, any unspent surplus being distributed to the employees who made the surplus possible. Personal interest would have every employee watching for any possible waste. Retiring employees would not be replaced, and hiring of new personnel would be almost eliminated.
- No money would be saved the first year, but after that, every department would have continuously lower budgets.
5. Court 4
July 20, 2009 by lloyd
--- CONTENTS---
BEFORE COURT APPEARANCE
AT HEARING
LIMITED JURISDICTION
DO NOT PLEA
SUBMIT MOTIONS etc
DEMAND HEARINGS
DEMAND BILL OF PARTICULARS
DEMAND VERIFIED COMPLAINT
DEMAND COPIES OF OATHS
OBJECTIONS
OBJECT TO TRIAL DATE
OBJECT TO NO ANSWERS
CONTEMPT
ASK QUESTIONS
DEMAND ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL
DEMAND A CONTINUANCE
DEMAND TO SELECT A JURY
MAKE OPENING STATEMENT
PROSECUTE OFFICIALS
CONTEMPT
COURT RULES
CLOSING STATEMENT [Example]
GET COURT RECORDS
CROSS EXAMINE WITNESSES
NOTE: ILCS refers to Illinois statutes, used here as examples. Rules refer to Illinois court rules, also used as examples, typical of all the states. Federal law quotes apply to all the states.
BEFORE COURT APPEARANCE
- Send Motions, Affidavit and Notices to the judge, prosecutor and the cops who arrested you.
- For a Brief about Notice of Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdiction, see: www.familyguardian.tzo.com
- Ask the clerk before the appearance to remind the judge to read your brief.
- See www.objection.com for free download and practice making objections. Failure to object timely is fatal. Appeals are only based on objections.
- Fast [Esther 4:13-16] and pray for God to lead the judge to the right decision through dreams. If you love your opponent, you can appear in court boldly [1 John 4:17].
AT HEARING
- [I'm not confident in this statement:] Since trick questions by the court may [wrongly] be presumed to establish the court's jurisdiction, avoid answering such questions.
- Examples of such questions are the following:
* Is this the motion you filed?
* Do you want a jury trial?
* Do you understand these charges?
- Answering yes or no allows the presumption of jurisdiction.
- [The following seems to have good support:] Instead say: My legal counsel said Before answering any questions, I must demand that the Motion to dismiss be addressed by the court first, according to requirements of law, as per the following case law and statutes etc.
[1] Quote: For execution of process to confer jurisdiction of the person it must have been issued from a court having jurisdiction of the subject matter. Unquote. ----- Duncan v. Archie Brothers, et al. 344 SW 2d 398.
[2] Quote: Since jurisdiction is fundamental to any valid judicial proceeding, the first question that must be determined by a trial court in any case is that of jurisdiction. Unquote. ----- Dillon v. Dillon, 187 P. 27
[3] Quote: There is no discretion to ignore lack of jurisdiction. Unquote. ----- Joyce v. U.S. 474 F 2d 215.
[4] Quote: Since jurisdiction is fundamental, and it is jurisdiction alone that gives a court power to hear, determine, and pronounce judgment on the issues before it, jurisdiction must be continuing in the court throughout the proceedings. ----- Unquote. Re. Cavitt, 254 P. 599.
[5] Quote: Challenge to court's jurisdiction is raised by motion to dismiss. ----- Criterion Ins. Co. v. State, 458 So. 2d. 22 [Fla 1st DCA 1984].
[6] Quote: (Example: 725 ILCS 5/114-1) PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS Motion to dismiss charge. [a] Upon written motion of defendant prior to trial before or after plea court may dismiss [if] The court does not have jurisdiction. ... [or] The charge does not state an offense.
[And there is no proper charge]
[b] The court shall require motion to dismiss be filed after defendant [is] arraigned.
[c] If the motion alleges facts not of record State shall file answer admitting, or denying each allegation
[d] When an issue of fact is presented by a motion to dismiss court shall conduct a hearing.
[7] Quote: The BURDEN shifts to the court to prove jurisdiction. Unquote. ----- Rosemond v. Lambert, 469 F 2d 416.
[8] Quote: Court must prove on the record all jurisdiction facts related to the jurisdiction asserted. Unquote. ----- Lantana v. Hopper, 102 F. 2d 188;
Chicago v. New York 37 F. Supp. 150.
[9] Quote: *Federal Practice and Procedure, Sect. 3522: The parties cannot confer on a court jurisdiction that has not been vested in that court by the Constitution and Congress. Unquote.
[10] Quote: Judges have responsibility to insure that any person forced into court is there for proper reasons. Unquote. *42 Federal Supplement 994, 998.
[11] Quote: Where a court fails to observe safeguards, it amounts to denial of due process of law, court is deprived of jurisdiction. Unquote. -----
Merritt v. Hunter, 170 F. 2d 739.
[12] Quote: Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but, rather should dismiss the action. Unquote. ----- Melo v. U.S., 505 F. 2d 1026.
[13] U.S. Constitution, Art. 3, Sect. 1 & 2 says the U.S. Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in cases in which a state is a party [such as if your case says State of NH versus John Doe; therefore the state or local court must allow the U.S. Supreme Court to take your case, which it won't do].
LIMITED JURISDICTION
* [Note: The legislature may define the "justiciable matter" in such a way as to preclude or limit the authority of the circuit court.]
- Quote. When a court's power to act is controlled by statute, the court is governed by the rules of limited jurisdiction, and courts exercising jurisdiction over such matters must proceed within the strictures of the statute. Unquote. ----- In re M.M., 156 Ill. 2d 53, 619 N.E. 2d 702 [1993].
- Quote. Special statutory jurisdiction is limited to the language of the act conferring it, and the court has no powers from any other source .... The authority of the court to make any order must be found in the statute. Unquote. ----- Midland Coal Co. v. Know County, 268 Ill. App. 3d 485, 644 N.E. 2d 796 4 Dist. [1994].
DO NOT PLEA
- My legal counsel said: If I made a plea, then withdraw it. I have not made a plea, but the court seems to have made a plea for me, unlawfully. I withdraw the plea and I demand or Motion to dismiss this case on the following grounds: The court does not have jurisdiction and there is no proper charge or the charge does not state an offense.
- My Motions show all 3 of these grounds: Lack of Jurisdiction; Improper Place of Trial [may not apply]; and There's no proper charge, so the "charge" does not state anything, including an offense.
- My legal counsel said: I cannot plea until errors of procedure and of improper arraignment are corrected.
- And the challenge of jurisdiction must be answered. The defendant is not mute or evasive with regard to plea, but the judge and plaintiff are evasive with regard to proving Subject Matter Jurisdiction.
SUBMIT MOTIONS etc
- I now submit a Notice of OBSTRUCTION of Justice in the Instant Case.
[FF Suggestion] Instead of Motions, make Demands. Motions are general appearances and are sometimes presumed to grant jurisdiction.
- I Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim [under civil rules] or failure to make charges [under criminal rules].
- As per Illinois Supreme Court Rules: ARTICLE II. Rule 218. Pretrial Procedure. a) Initial Case Management Conference. The court shall hold case management conference within 35 days after the parties are at issue, I do not waive any of my rights, including the right to a pre-trial conference or hearing, which I request to be held at this time for a period of one hour.
- And, as per (625 ILCS 5/2-118) Hearings [d] All hearings and hearing procedures shall comply with requirements of the Constitution, I demand a Hearing or pre-trial conference to answer the averments of my Motions.
- And as per (725 ILCS 5/103-6) Waiver of Jury Trial. Every defendant has the right to trial by jury unless [ii] s/he fails to demand it. Therefore, if the court ignores proper judicial procedure by not properly answering the averments of my Motions to Dismiss, then I would demand a trial by jury.
DEMAND HEARINGS
- Defense has the right to discovery and then a pre-trial hearing.
- I demand a motion hearing be set for my motions.
[If using discovery, demand an evidentiary hearing on the results of discovery questions.
DEMAND BILL OF PARTICULARS
(Example: 725 ILCS 5/111-6) The law says, on Bill of Particulars. court may, on written motion of the defendant, require State's Attorney to furnish Bill of Particulars, I submit a Motion for a Bill of Particulars.
(Example: 725 ILCS 5/114-2) Motion for a bill of particulars.
[a] written motion for bill of particulars be filed before or after arraignment
specify the particulars of the offense necessary to enable to the defense to prepare
DEMAND VERIFIED COMPLAINT
- My legal counsel said: there can also be no plea till the complaint is verified, as per (Example: 725 ILCS 5/111-3) Quote. Charging an Offense. A ... Ticket constitutes a complaint [unless] defendant requests verified complaint. Unquote. I demand a verified complaint.
DEMAND COPIES OF OATHS
[Dean said: Get oaths of office of the cop, judge, prosecutor and clerk.]
- I demand to receive Certified Copies of Oaths of Office of all officers of the Court involved in my case.
- I demand the following of all officers of the Court involved:
1- Does the officer have a claim against me?
2- Is the officer a Creditor or debtor to appear?
3- What is the value of the case?
4- Are you using my name or property for profit?
5- What are each Officer's phone number, Private phone number, Driver license number and SSN?
6- What are each Officer's Bond requirements?
7- What are each Officer's Billing address, Home address, City and County?
8- What are each Officer's Property out of state?
9- What are all of each Officer's property and accounts under his/her Esquire name?
OBJECTIONS
OBJECT TO TRIAL DATE
- I object to the judge trying to set a trial date without first following due process as I previously demanded.
[Note again: Failure to object timely is fatal. Appeals are only based on objections.]
- I object to setting a trial date or continuance without first having a hearing on my Motions to Dismiss etc.
[If case goes to trial, demand a jury trial.]
OBJECT TO NO ANSWERS
[If plaintiff and judge don't answer the challenge, ask:]
- I object to the Court's evasion of my Motions to Dismiss, as this violates due process.
- Evasion is falsifying the record, which is criminal obstruction of justice.
- I demand to know what rules the Court is following.
- Failure to answer means the averments [in the Motion] are presumed true.
- I demand answers and to know the grounds for proceeding without proving jurisdiction.
- Under our form of government public officers are political trustees and citizens are political trustors.
- Are not trustees answerable to trustors?
- And, therefore, isn't it the duty of political trustees to answer citizens' questions about facts of governance?
CONTEMPT
[FF said: You cannot be in contempt for asking a question. www.frogfarm.org.]
[avoiceforchildren.com said: If the judge threatens to charge Contempt of Court, ask:]
- Is it civil or criminal contempt?
- If criminal, who makes the claim? What is the crime? Who is the injured party?
[Wait for response.]
- If civil, ask, where is the contract between us?
- I don't agree to the terms of the contract.
[If the claimant is said to be the state, the judicial system, the court etc, say:]
- You know only a person can make a claim; the state can't; and you know there is no injured party.
ASK QUESTIONS
- [Ask aloud to the court:] Does anyone have a valid claim against First Middle : Last-Name?
DEMAND ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL
- As per the 6th Amendment, I cannot proceed without ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL.
[FF said to see www.jusbelli.com Contract for Assistance of Counsel, which contract makes it unlikely that any lawyer will accept the case.]
[LD said: You cannot be jailed if you did not have appointed counsel]
DEMAND A CONTINUANCE
- As per (Example: 725 ILCS 5/114-4) Motion for continuance. [a] Quote. The defendant ... may move for a continuance. If the motion is made more than 30 days after arraignment [it] shall be in writing and supported by affidavit. Unquote. [b] The motion is granted when: [2] [Defense counsel is] unable to prepare [3] material [defense] witness is unavailable...; or [4] [Defendant's condition prevents attendance]; or [5] ...Prejudice against defendant [in] the community; or [6] The amendment of a charge or bill of particulars [from the prosecution] has taken the defendant by surprise....
[LD said: Ask for a re-arraignment. Demand the pre-trial rights that they should have told you about, like demurer.
[LD said: If they did not Mirandize you, Use this Suppression Motion: awww.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/5902.html to suppress their evidence.
[Without a warrant, they violated your rights coming on your property.]
- I submit a Motion to Suppress all Evidence gained by plaintiff without the proper Miranda warning or without a warrant.
DEMAND TO SELECT A JURY
- (Example: 725 ILCS 5/114-3) Quote. Motion to discharge jury panel. [a] [This motion] shall be raised ... prior to the voir dire examination. Unquote.
- As per [Example:] ARTICLE II. Rule 234. Quote. Voir Dire Examination of Jurors and Cautionary Instructions. The court shall permit the parties [to make] direct inquiry, therefore, I demand to make direct inquiry of the jury candidates. [Dismiss any candidate who is biased against you].
MAKE OPENING STATEMENT
[Example:] Rule 235. Quote. Opening Statements. The plaintiff may make an opening statement. The defendant may immediately follow
[Read Affidavit.]
[LB said: Quo warranto is used to determine if a person holds office. It [the warrant] must show harm is likely to come to the public.]
- Quote. Respondent has burden of proving his right to office. Unquote. [*State v. Murphy 148 SW 2d 527 and Burkett v. Ulmer, 15 A. 2d 858].
- Quote. Where the officer steps outside his authority, the remedy is quo warranto [*State v. Prevatt, 148 So. 578].
- Quote. The individual [complainant] ... must show he has an interest in the question [i.e. in the charge].
- [Say:] I wish to quote some important Law facts.
- Quote. The sole object and only legitimate end of government is to protect the citizen in the enjoyment of life, liberty, and property, and, when the government assumes other functions, it is usurpation and oppression. ----- City Council v. Kelly, 38 So., 67, 69; 142 Ala. 552 [1905].
- Quote. Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them. ----- Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491.
- Quote. Law and court-made rules of expediency must not be placed above the constitution. ----- State v. Arregui, 44 Idaho 43, 254 P. 788, 52 A.L.R. 463.
- Quote. A man may not barter away his life, freedom, or substantial rights [Const. art. 1, para. 1].----- 176 A. 692, 693 [1935].
- Quote. Every act of a state legislature repugnant to the Constitution is absolutely void. ----- Vanhorne's Lessee v. Dorance [F CC P] 2 U.S. 304, 1 L. Ed. 391.
- Quote. A citation to appear before a magistrate is not a court process, and it does not have legal efficacy of a warrant or summons. -----
Cr. Code Prac. Section 46. Duncan v. Archie Brothers, et al. 344 SW 2d 398.
[Dean Reread the citation. The wrong *statute or the wrong subparagraph may have been cited, making ticket void for vagueness. Check to see that there may be no rule or regulation that implements the statute.]
- I demand that statutory rules that apply to my case be put into evidence with certifying documentation.
- I Object on grounds that tickets are not judicial process.
- Where is the seal and signature of the court officer?
- How can tickets be judicial process?
- I Demand to know the nature and cause of the accusation [so as not to be presumed to know].
- Is the court following civil or criminal procedure?
[Give notice of discovery.]
- I hereby give Notice of Dicsovery.
[If plaintiff does not answer or give documents, motion to compel them as follows.]
- I motion that the plaintiff be compelled to answer or give the requested documents.
- I object to prosecutor's question being: leading, argumentative, based on hearsay, irrelevant, vague, requiring witness to draw a conclusion.
- I object to irrelevant or evasive answers etc and demand direct answers.
- Evasion is obstruction of justice and criminal fraud.
PROSECUTE OFFICIALS
[ED44 said: frequently send certified mail to the FBI and Dept. of Justice about your case as you proceed in your action.]
CONTEMPT
[FF said: When the court fights you, say:]
- I'm going to make an Offer of Proof for my Appeal, also Offer into Evidence.
[If pressured, ask:]
- Are you trying to Rush me to Judgment?
[LB said: attorneys bring in extraneous information via motions and briefs, to tilt the judge's mind in their favor.]
COURT RULES
[Remember, the rules don't apply to you, only to the court officers.]
[When the judge enforces rules on you but not on the prosecutor, yell:
- Substance over form!
[Force them to keep coming back to real law of the Constitution and Statutes.]
Hearings. (Example: 625 ILCS 5/2-118)
[a] Upon the suspension of license the Secretary shall immediately notify such person in writing
upon his written request shall, within 20 days after receipt thereof, set a date for a hearing
[Examples:] Rule 505. Notice to Accused.
When issuing a Uniform Citation officer shall also issue written notice to accused
Rule 222. Discovery
Rule 61. CANON 1. Judge shall uphold independence of Judiciary [not let cops issue summons]
Rule 63. CANON 3.
[1] Judge shall perform duties impartially [3] be patient [with disabled]
[4] Judge shall accord every person right to be heard
[8] Judge shall not manifest bias or prejudice [of] disability, or socio-economic status
(725 ILCS 5/101) Rule 101 Summons ...
The summons shall be issued under the seal of the court, tested in the name of the clerk, and signed
(725 ILCS 5/103-1) Rights of the Accused. Rights on Arrest.
[b] person making the arrest shall inform the person arrested of the nature of the offense
(725 ILCS 5/107-2) [1] Arrest by Peace Officer.
peace officer may arrest person when: [c] reasonable grounds to believe the person is committing an offense
(725 ILCS 5/107-9) Issuance of arrest warrant upon complaint.
[a] When a complaint is presented to a court ... it shall examine upon oath the complainant
[b] The complaint shall be in writing and shall: [2] State the offense [4] Be subscribed and sworn to by the complainant.
(725 ILCS 5/107-11) When summons may be issued.
[a] When authroized to issue a warrant of arrest, a court may instead issue a summons.
[b] The summons shall ... [3] Set forth the nature of the offense; ...
[5] Be signed by the judge of the court with the title of his or her office ....
(725 ILCS 5/111-3) Charging an Offense. Form of Charge.
[3] [state the nature and elements of the offenses charged]
(725 ILCS 5/111-6) Bill of Particulars.
At the trial of the cause the state's evidence shall be confined to the particulars of the bill.
CLOSING STATEMENT [Example]
- 4TH BRANCH. The headless fourth branch of government [was alluded to by U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Jackson in 1952. ----- Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co. 343 U.S. 470, 487, 72 W. Ct. 800, 810, 96 L. Ed. 1081.
- The 1937 Brownless Report concluded that federal administrative agencies had become a "headless 'fourth branch' of government, a haphazard collection of irresponsible agencies and uncoordinated powers." ----- FDR's 1937 "President's Committee on Administrative Management, Report with Special Studies," known as the "Brownless Report."
- LAWYERS. 75-90% of American trial lawyers are incompetent, dishonest, or both. ----- Warren Burger, Former Chief Justice, U.S. Supreme Court
- In studying the law to learn to defend myself, in the event that I do not find assistance of competent counsel who can accompany me in court, I learned that abuses in government seem to be mounting, as evidenced by increasing adoption of presumptions of law. I've also learned of abuses via the news a few years ago that Governor Ryan pardoned numerous Illinois prisoners because he concluded that they did not receive fair trials. The fact that such abuses are made public is encouraging, because it makes possible improvement.
- Society is finding ways to help addicts, including alcoholics, recover from addiction. The courts have been getting better, I think, at helping to pressure addicts into treatment. As M. Scott Peck said in his book, People of the Lie, people in successful groups tend to develop pride and the attitude that their group cannot be wrong. Pride prevents group self-examination, but it's only by such self-examination that groups, including those in government, can correct their wrongs.
GET COURT RECORDS
[Read the record before the reporter submits it and get any mistakes corrected.
[Get the audio & written court transcript. Get certified copies each day or week. Purchase the transcript and the audio for about $10 for the tape.
[Check for contradictory statements over time.
[Check the register of actions. The clerk keeps a record of everything that happens.
[Have the court recorder make a declaration that the record is true and correct, swearing before someone who can administer an oath.
[You cannot be jailed if they cannot give you a transcript.
[Challenge any transcript alterations and subpoena the jury as witnesses to what was said. In a hearing to challenge the record, subpoena the witness that the record is in question about.
[The clerk and court reporter might make your best witnesses.
[If they change your transcript, file a NOTICE OF CORRECTION OF RECORD, and if the opposition objects, ask for the recording to be put on the record. The response will be silence.
[If you think the transcript is altered, subpoena the reporter AND the notes and recordings of the reporter.
[If the judge turns you down, file a civil lawsuit against the judge.
Rule 71 Violation of Rules
Judge who violates court rules may be subject to discipline by Courts Commission.
(725 ILCS 5/103-1) Rights of the Accused. Rights on Arrest.
[h] Any peace officer who fails to comply is guilty of official misconduct
CROSS EXAMINE
[These are questions I had prepared for my traffic tickets case. Some of them would apply to your case.]
- I request that the accusing officer's duly sworn statement of what happened between him and me, the defendant, on the night of June 17th, 2003 be put into evidence.
- I also request a copy of the statement and a few minutes to read it over while the officer reads it on the stand.
[Cross examine the officer:]
- Are you a peace officer?
- As a public officer, do you know you're presumed to know the law?
- Did you know public officers have immunity from prosecution or lawsuits for performing their lawful duties?
- Did you know public officers have no immunity from prosecution or lawsuits for stepping outside of their authority?
- Do you recall any incidents in your detainment of me on the night of June 17th, 2003 that may have been outside of your authority?
- Did you have authority to detain me? [Add Ill. cite, which says those stopped for traffic violations may not be arrested or jailed.]
- On what grounds?
- Did you have authority to arrest me?
- On what grounds?
- Did you have authority to handcuff me and take me to jail 20 miles away from my car?
- On what grounds?
- Why was I not put in jail in Belleville when you took me there that night?
- What did you and the staff say to each other there at the Belleville jail that night, just before you released me?
- Why did you ask me for money twice on the way to Belleville?
- Why did you first ask me for $220, then later ask for $120?
- Why did you give me no copies of the tickets that I signed under duress at the jail?
- What branch of the government is your office under?
- What branch of the government is authorized to issue warrants or summons?
- What is required for a warrant, summons, or complaint to be lawful? [the signature & seal of judicial officer & a sworn statement of complainant]
- Did the traffic citations you filled out for me on June 17th have the force and effect of law for a proper summons?
- Can your lawyer answer for you?
- Where is the signature and seal of a judicial officer and the sworn statement of the complainant?
- If the citations were not lawful judicial process, then my case must now be dismissed for lack of due process.
- I ask the court, on what grounds can I be held here now, without proper judicial summons?
- What are unalienable rights?
- Who owns the public roadways? [the public]
- Who has the unalienable right to travel on public roadways? [the public]
- Can unalienable rights be licensed or abridged? [no]
- Who owns my car when I have sole legal title to it? [I do]
- When would I be required to get myself or my car licensed and insured to use the public roadways? [when using them for hauling people or goods for profit on public roadways]
- Is it true that anyone may use any means to travel that does not endanger anyone or anyone's property? This is part of the law that you are presumed to know.
- How does traveling in a car without license or insurance endanger anyone or property?
- Does the preamble to the Constitution say the purpose of the Constitution is partly to promote the general welfare of the people?
- Are the poor among the people whose welfare the Constitution is meant to support?
- How can the poor [which I declared under oath that I am] experience the unalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, if they cannot afford licenses, insurance, and numerous government fees for travel?
- Who has the right to take away from the poor the unalienable right to travel without licenses etc?
- Do you swear under oath that you did not deny me any of my rights during your detainment of me?
- Do you know I made a sworn statement that you denied me my Miranda rights during the detainment?
- Do you swear you did not deny my Miranda rights at that time?
- Do you know what constitutes a proper oath? [to affirm statements are true under penalty of perjury]
- Will you sign an oath to that effect?
- Would you agree to take a polygraph test on this matter?
- Do you have any regrets about how you treated me during your detaining of me on the night of June 17th?
- Do you believe you made any errors of proper procedure in the detainment?
- Did you forget to tell or ask me anything that night?
- Did you ask if I had children? If so, why?
- When I told you at the Brooklyn police station that the handcuffs were uncomfortable, did you say anything you should not have said?
- Did you say they're supposed to be uncomfortable?
- Which branch of government determines guilt or innocence of defendants?
- Which branch are you in?
- Were you stepping outside the scope of your authority by making that comment?
- Will you read for the court parts from the U.S. Constitution, Art. 3, Sections 2 & 3?
- What court has original jurisdiction in any case in which a state is a party?
- Who are the parties in my case?
- What's the difference between the People of the State of Illinois and the State of Illinois?
- Can the judge or prosecutor help out?
- I ask the court, is my case now dismissed?
- Do you respect my power as a U.S. citizen, even though I'm poor?
[In the case of a bank presuming to foreclose on a property, point out that the bank did not use its own money to supply the loan, therefore the bank did not own that money to begin with, and therefore has no right to the property.]
Re: FSP Discussions
June 14, 2009 by lloyd
History of American Economics
The following seems to disprove much of what Howard stated about economics.
"American System" Economics + Defending Public Credit
http://members.tripod.com/american_almanac/nbs1.htm
ROOTS OF THE AMERICAN SYSTEM
http://members.tripod.com/american_almanac/cameral.htm
COLBERT'S LEGACY TO THE AMERICAN SYSTEM
http://members.tripod.com/american_almanac/colbert.htm
COLONIAL PRECURSORS OF HAMILTON
http://members.tripod.com/american_almanac/precurs.htm
REPORT ON A NATIONAL BANK
http://members.tripod.com/american_almanac/hambank.htm
Henry Clay's War Hawks
http://members.tripod.com/american_almanac/warhawk.htm
Henry Clay: National Development
http://members.tripod.com/american_almanac/hclay.htm
Henry Carey and William McKinley
http://members.tripod.com/american_almanac/carey95.htm
British Imperial Policy Means Famine
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2008/3517brit_imperial_famine.html
How British Free Trade Starved Millions During Ireland's Potato Famine
http://members.tripod.com/american_almanac/potato.htm
FREE TRADE IS FOR BARBARIAN TRIBES
http://members.tripod.com/american_almanac/thaddeus.htm
History of a Myth: Does Technology Steal Jobs?
http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2002/2922tech_jobs.html
5. Court 3
June 10, 2009 by lloyd
BEFORE COURT APPEARANCE
- Send Motions, Affidavit and Notices to the judge and prosecutor.
- For Brief re Notice of Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdiction, see: http://www.arkenterprises.com/ritepriv.htm
- Ask the clerk before the appearance to remind the judge to read your brief.
- See www.objection.com for free download and practice making objections. Failure to object timely is fatal. Appeals are only based on objections.
- Fast [Esther 4:13-16] and pray for God to lead the judge to the right decision through dreams. If you love your opponent, you can appear in court boldly [1 John 4:17].
IN COURT
- Since trick questions by the court may [wrongly] be presumed to establish the court's jurisdiction, avoid answering such questions.
- Examples of such questions are the following:
* Is this the motion you filed?
* Do you want a jury trial?
* Do you understand these charges?
- Answering yes or no allows the presumption of jurisdiction.
- Instead say: My legal counsel said Before answering any questions, I must demand that the Motion to dismiss be addressed by the court first, according to requirements of law, as per the following case law and statutes etc.
[1] Quote: For execution of process to confer jurisdiction of the person it must have been issued from a court having jurisdiction of the subject matter. Unquote. ----- Duncan v. Archie Brothers, et al. 344 SW 2d 398.
[2] Quote: Since jurisdiction is fundamental to any valid judicial proceeding, the first question that must be determined by a trial court in any case is that of jurisdiction. Unquote. ----- Dillon v. Dillon, 187 P. 27
[3] Quote: There is no discretion to ignore lack of jurisdiction. Unquote. ----- Joyce v. U.S. 474 F 2d 215.
[4] Quote: Since jurisdiction is fundamental, and it is jurisdiction alone that gives a court power to hear, determine, and pronounce judgment on the issues before it, jurisdiction must be continuing in the court throughout the proceedings. ----- Unquote. Re. Cavitt, 254 P. 599.
[5] Quote: Challenge to court's jurisdiction is raised by motion to dismiss. ----- Criterion Ins. Co. v. State, 458 So. 2d. 22 [Fla 1st DCA 1984].
[6] Quote: (725 ILCS 5/114-1) PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS Motion to dismiss charge. [a] Upon written motion of defendant prior to trial before or after plea court may dismiss [if] The court does not have jurisdiction. ... [or] The charge does not state an offense.
[And there is no proper charge]
[b] The court shall require motion to dismiss be filed after defendant [is] arraigned.
[c] If the motion alleges facts not of record State shall file answer admitting, or denying each allegation
[d] When an issue of fact is presented by a motion to dismiss court shall conduct a hearing.
[7] Quote: The BURDEN shifts to the court to prove jurisdiction. Unquote. ----- Rosemond v. Lambert, 469 F 2d 416.
[8] Quote: Court must prove on the record all jurisdiction facts related to the jurisdiction asserted. Unquote. ----- Lantana v. Hopper, 102 F. 2d 188;
Chicago v. New York 37 F. Supp. 150.
[9] Quote: *Federal Practice and Procedure, Sect. 3522: The parties cannot confer on a court jurisdiction that has not been vested in that court by the Constitution and Congress. Unquote.
[10] Quote: Judges have responsibility to insure that any person forced into court is there for proper reasons. Unquote. *42 Federal Supplement 994, 998.
[11] Quote: Where a court fails to observe safeguards, it amounts to denial of due process of law, court is deprived of jurisdiction. Unquote. -----
Merritt v. Hunter, 170 F. 2d 739.
[12] Quote: Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but, rather should dismiss the action. Unquote. ----- Melo v. U.S., 505 F. 2d 1026.
[13] U.S. Constitution, Art. 3, Sect. 1&2 says the U.S. Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in cases in which a state is a party.
LIMITED JURISDICTION
* [Note: The legislature may define the "justiciable matter" in such a way to preclude or limit the authority of the circuit court.]
- Quote. When a court's power to act is controlled by statute, the court is governed by the rules of limited jurisdiction, and courts exercising jurisdiction over such matters must proceed within the strictures of the statute. Unquote. ----- In re M.M., 156 Ill. 2d 53, 619 N.E. 2d 702 [1993].
- Quote. Special statutory jurisdiction is limited to the language of the act conferring it, and the court has no powers from any other source .... The authority of the court to make any order must be found in the statute. Unquote. ----- Midland Coal Co. v. Know County, 268 Ill. App. 3d 485, 644 N.E. 2d 796 4 Dist. [1994].
DO NOT PLEA
- My legal counsel said: If I made a plea, then withdraw it. I have not made a plea, but the court seems to have made a plea for me, unlawfully. I withdraw the plea and I demand or Motion to dismiss this case on the following grounds: The court does not have jurisdiction and there is no proper charge or the charge does not state an offense.
- My Motions show all 3 of these grounds: Lack of Jurisdiction; Improper Place of Trial; and There's no proper charge, so the "charge" does not state anything, including an offense.
- My legal counsel said: I cannot plea until errors of procedure and of improper arraignment are corrected.
- And the challenge of jurisdiction must be answered. The defendant is not mute or evasive with regard to plea, but the judge and plaintiff are evasive with regard to proving Subject Matter Jurisdiction.
SUBMIT MOTIONS etc
- I now submit a Notice of OBSTRUCTION of Justice in the Instant Case.
[FF Suggestion] Instead of Motions, make Demands. Motions are general appearances and are sometimes presumed to grant jurisdiction.
- I Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim [under civil rules] or failure to make charges [under criminal rules].
- As per Illinois Supreme Court Rules: ARTICLE II. Rule 218. Pretrial Procedure. a) Initial Case Management Conference. The court shall hold case management conference within 35 days after the parties are at issue, I do not waive any of my rights, including the right to a pre-trial conference or hearing, which I request to be held at this time for a period of one hour.
- And, as per (625 ILCS 5/2-118) Hearings [d] All hearings and hearing procedures shall comply with requirements of the Constitution, I demand a Hearing or pre-trial conference to answer the averments of my Motions.
- And as per (725 ILCS 5/103-6) Waiver of Jury Trial. Every defendant has the right to trial by jury unless [ii] s/he fails to demand it. Therefore, if the court ignores proper judicial procedure by not properly answering the averments of my Motions to Dismiss, then I would demand a trial by jury.
DEMAND HEARINGS
- Defense has the right to discovery and then a pre-trial hearing.
- I demand a motion hearing be set for my motions.
[If using discovery, demand an evidentiary hearing on the results of discovery questions.
DEMAND BILL OF PARTICULARS
(725 ILCS 5/111-6) Bill of Particulars. court may, on written motion of the defendant, require State's Attorney to furnish Bill of Particulars, I submit a Motion for a Bill of Particulars.
(725 ILCS 5/114-2) Motion for a bill of particulars.
[a] written motion for bill of particulars be filed before or after arraignment
specify particulars of the offense necessary to enable to prepare
DEMAND VERIFIED COMPLAINT
- My legal counsel said: there can also be no plea till the complaint is verified, as per (725 ILCS 5/111-3) Quote. Charging an Offense. A ... Ticket constitutes a complaint [unless] defendant requests verified complaint. Unquote. I demand a verified complaint.
DEMAND COPIES OF OATHS
[Dean: Get oaths of office of the cop, judge, prosecutor and clerk.]
- I demand to receive Certified Copies of Oaths of Office of all officers of the Court involved in my case.
- I demand the following of all officers of the Court involved:
1- Does the officer have a claim against me?
2- Is the officer a Creditor or debtor to appear?
3- What is the value of the case?
4- Are you using my name or property for profit?
5- What are Officer's phone number, Private phone number, Driver license number and SSN?
6- What are Officer's Bond requirements?
7- What are Officer's Billing address, Home address, City and County?
8- What are Officer's Property out of state?
9- What are all of Officer's property and accounts under his/her Esquire name?
OBJECTIONS
OBJECT TO TRIAL DATE
- I object to the judge trying to set a trial date without first following due process as I previously demanded.
[Note: Failure to object timely is fatal. Appeals are only based on objections.]
- I object to setting a trial date or continuance without first having a hearing on my Motions to Dismiss etc.
[If case goes to trial, demand a jury trial.]
OBJECT TO NO ANSWERS
[If plaintiff and judge don't answer challenge, ask:]
- I object to the Court's evasion of my Motions to Dismiss, as this violates due process.
- Evasion is falsifying the record, which is criminal obstruction of justice.
- I demand to know what rules the Court is following.
- Failure to answer means the averments are presumed true.
- I demand answers and to know the grounds for proceeding without proving jurisdiction.
- Under our form of government public officers are political trustees and citizens are political trustors.
- Are not trustees answerable to trustors?
- And, therefore, isn't it the duty of political trustees to answer citizens' questions about facts of governance?
CONTEMPT
[FF: You cannot be in contempt for asking a question. www.frogfarm.org ]
[avoiceforchildren.com says: If the judge threatens to charge Contempt of Court, ask:]
- Is it civil or criminal contempt?
- If criminal, who makes the claim? What is the crime? Who is the injured party?
[Wait for response.]
- If civil, where is the contract between us?
- I don't agree to the terms of the contract.
[If the claimant is said to be the state, the judicial system, the court etc, say:]
- You know only a person can make a claim; the state can't; and you know there is no injured party.
ASK QUESTIONS
- Does anyone have a valid claim against First Middle : Last-Name?
DEMAND ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL
- As per the 6th Amendment, I cannot proceed without ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL.
[FF: www.jusbelli.com Contract for Assistance of Counsel]
[LD: You cannot be jailed if you did not have appointed counsel]
DEMAND A CONTINUANCE
- As per (725 ILCS 5/114-4) Motion for continuance. [a] Quote. The defendant ... may move for a continuance. If the motion is made more than 30 days after arraignment [it] shall be in writing and supported by affidavit. Unquote. [b] The motion is granted when: [2] [Defense counsel is] unable to prepare [3] material [defense] witness is unavailable...; or [4] [Defendant's condition prevents attendance]; or [5] ...Prejudice against defendant [in] the community; or [6] The amendment of a charge or bill of particulars has taken the defendant by surprise....
[LD: Ask for a re-arraignment. Demand the pre-trial rights that they should have told you about, like demurer.
[LD: If they did not Mirandize you, Use this Suppression Motion: awww.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/5902.html to suppress their evidence.
[Without a warrant, they violated your rights coming on your property.]
- I submit a Motion to Suppress all Evidence gained by plaintiff without the proper Miranda warning or without a warrant.
DEMAND TO SELECT JURY
- (725 ILCS 5/114-3) Quote. Motion to discharge jury panel. [a] [This motion] shall be raised ... prior to the voir dire examination. Unquote.
- As per ARTICLE II. Rule 234. Quote. Voir Dire Examination of Jurors and Cautionary Instructions. The court shall permit the parties [to make] direct inquiry, therefore, I demand to make direct inquiry of the candidates for jury.
MAKE OPENING STATEMENT
Rule 235. Quote. Opening Statements. The plaintiff may make an opening statement. The defendant may immediately follow
[Read Affidavit.]
[LB: Quo warranto is used to determine if a person holds office. It must show harm is likely to come to the public.]
- Quote. Respondent has burden of proving his right to office. Unquote. [*State v. Murphy 148 SW 2d 527 and Burkett v. Ulmer, 15 A. 2d 858].
- Quote. Where the officer steps outside his authority, the remedy is quo warranto [*State v. Prevatt, 148 So. 578].
- Quote. The individual [complainant] ... must show he has an interest in the question.
- I wish to quote some important Law facts.
- Quote. The sole object and only legitimate end of government is to protect the citizen in the enjoyment of life, liberty, and property, and, when the government assumes other functions, it is usurpation and oppression. ----- City Council v. Kelly, 38 So., 67, 69; 142 Ala. 552 [1905].
- Quote. Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them. ----- Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491.
- Quote. Law and court-made rules of expediency must not be placed above the constitution. ----- State v. Arregui, 44 Idaho 43, 254 P. 788, 52 A.L.R. 463.
- Quote. A man may not barter away his life, freedom, or substantial rights [Const. art. 1, para. 1].----- 176 A. 692, 693 [1935].
- Quote. Every act of a state legislature repugnant to the Constitution is absolutely void. ----- Vanhorne's Lessee v. Dorance [F CC P] 2 U.S. 304, 1 L. Ed. 391.
- Quote. A citation to appear before a magistrate is not a court process, and it does not have legal efficacy of a warrant or summons. -----
Cr. Code Prac. Section 46. Duncan v. Archie Brothers, et al. 344 SW 2d 398.
[Dean Reread the citation. The wrong *statute or the wrong subparagraph may have been cited, making ticket void for vagueness. Check to see that there may be no rule or regulation that implements the statute.]
- I demand that statutory rules that apply to my case be put into evidence with certifying documentation.
- I Object on grounds that tickets are not judicial process.
- Where is the seal and signature of the court officer?
- How can tickets be judicial process?
- I Demand to know the nature and cause of the accusation [so as not to be presumed to know].
- Is the court following civil or criminal procedure?
[Give notice of discovery.]
- I hereby give Notice of Dicsovery.
[If plaintiff does not answer or give documents, motion to compel them.]
- I motion that the plaintiff be compelled to answer or give the requested documents.
- I object to prosecutor's question being: leading, argumentative, based on hearsay, irrelevant, vague, requiring witness to draw a conclusion.
- I object to irrelevant or evasive answers etc and demand direct answers.
- Evasion is obstruction of justice and criminal fraud.
PROSECUTE OFFICIALS
[ED44: frequently send certified mail to the FBI and Dept. of Justice about your case as you proceed in your action.]
CONTEMPT
[FF: When the court fights you, say:]
- I'm going to make an Offer of Proof for my Appeal, also Offer into Evidence.
[If pressured, ask:]
- Are you trying to Rush me to Judgment?
[LB: attorneys bring in extraneous information via motions and briefs, to tilt the judge's mind.]
COURT RULES
[Remember, the rules don't apply to you, only to the court officers.]
[When the judge enforces rules on you but not on the prosecutor, yell:
- Substance over form!
[Force them to keep coming back to real law of the Constitution and Statutes.]
Hearings. (625 ILCS 5/2-118)
[a] Upon the suspension of license the Secretary shall immediately notify such person in writing
upon his written request shall, within 20 days after receipt thereof, set a date for a hearing
Rule 505. Notice to Accused.
When issuing a Uniform Citation officer shall also issue written notice to accused
Rule 222. Discovery
Rule 61. CANON 1. Judge shall uphold independence of Judiciary [not let cops issue summons]
Rule 63. CANON 3.
[1] Judge shall perform duties impartially [3] be patient [with disabled]
[4] Judge shall accord every person right to be heard
[8] Judge shall not manifest bias or prejudice [of] disability, or socio-economic status
(725 ILCS 5/101) Rule 101 Summons ...
The summons shall be issued under the seal of the court, tested in the name of the clerk, and signed
(725 ILCS 5/103-1) Rights of the Accused. Rights on Arrest.
[b] person making the arrest shall inform the person arrested of the nature of the offense
(725 ILCS 5/107-2) [1] Arrest by Peace Officer.
peace officer may arrest person when: [c] reasonable grounds to believe the person is committing an offense
(725 ILCS 5/107-9) Issuance of arrest warrant upon complaint.
[a] When a complaint is presented to a court ... it shall examine upon oath the complainant
[b] The complaint shall be in writing and shall: [2] State the offense [4] Be subscribed and sworn to by the complainant.
(725 ILCS 5/107-11) When summons may be issued.
[a] When authroized to issue a warrant of arrest, a court may instead issue a summons.
[b] The summons shall ... [3] Set forth the nature of the offense; ...
[5] Be signed by the judge of the court with the title of his or her office ....
(725 ILCS 5/111-3) Charging an Offense. Form of Charge.
[3] [state the nature and elements of the offenses charged]
(725 ILCS 5/111-6) Bill of Particulars.
At the trial of the cause the state's evidence shall be confined to the particulars of the bill.
CLOSING STATEMENT
- The Declaration of Independence relates that the reason for the declaration was a long train of government abuses. About a third of the people of the U.S. during and after the Revolution remained loyal to Britain's abusive system. Another third were only half-hearted supporters of the new government. These elements soon gained power and gradually subverted the American system, preventing efforts to end slavery by 1810 etc, until the abuses by 1970 had become nearly as great as those that led to our independence.
- 4TH BRANCH. The headless fourth branch of government [was alluded to by U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Jackson in 1952. ----- Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co. 343 U.S. 470, 487, 72 W. Ct. 800, 810, 96 L. Ed. 1081. 12.8-9.. The 1937 Brownless Report concluded that federal administrative agencies had become a "headless 'fourth branch' of government, a haphazard collection of irresponsible agencies and uncoordinated powers." ----- FDR's 1937 "President's Committee on Administrative Management, Report with Special Studies," known as the "Brownless Report."
- LAWYERS. 75-90% of American trial lawyers are incompetent, dishonest, or both. ----- Warren Burger, Former Chief Justice, U.S. Supreme Court
- In studying the law to learn to defend myself, in the event that I do not find assistance of competent counsel who can accompany me in court, I learned that abuses in government seem to be mounting, as evidenced by increasing adoption of presumptions of law. I've also learned abuses from the news media, as in the fact that the U.S. prison population per capita is among the highest in the world and that Governor Ryan pardoned numerous Illinois prisoners because he concluded that they did not receive fair trials. The fact that such abuses are made public is encouraging, because it makes possible improvement.
- I was raised by an abusive parent and encountered other abusive elders in my childhood. Thankfully, parent abuse has become public knowledge and the problem seems to be gradually ebbing. Likewise, society is finding ways to help addicts, including alcoholics, recover from addiction. The courts have been getting better, I think, at helping to pressure addicts into treatment. As M. Scott Peck said in his book, People of the Lie, people in successful groups tend to develop pride and the attitude that they cannot be wrong. Pride prevents group self-examination, but it's only by such self-examination that groups can correct their wrongs. I've been in recovery myself for many years from food addiction and I've learned the value of humility. I hope to encourage those in government who are part of a fairly corrupt and abusive system to learn the value of this and self-examination.
GET COURT RECORDS
[Read the record before the reporter submits it and get any mistakes corrected.
[Get the audio & written court transcript. Get certified copies each day or week. Purchase the transcript and the audio for about $10 for the tape.
[Check for contradictory statements over time.
[Check the register of actions. The clerk keeps a record of everything that happens.
[Have the court recorder make a declaration that the record is true and correct, swearing before someone who can administer an oath.
[You cannot be jailed if they cannot give you a transcript.
[Challenge any transcript alterations and subpoena the jury as witnesses to what was said. In a hearing to challenge the record, subpoena the witness that the record is in question about.
[The clerk and court reporter might make your best witnesses.
[If they change your transcript, file a NOTICE OF CORRECTION OF RECORD, and if the opposition objects, ask for the recording to be put on the record. The response will be silence.
[If you think the transcript is altered, subpoena the reporter AND the notes and recordings of the reporter.
[If the judge turns you down, file a civil lawsuit against the judge.
Rule 71 Violation of Rules
Judge who violates court rules may be subject to discipline by Courts Commission.
(725 ILCS 5/103-1) Rights of the Accused. Rights on Arrest.
[h] Any peace officer who fails to comply is guilty of official misconduct
CROSS EXAMINE
[These are questions I had prepared for my traffic tickets case. Some of them would apply to your case.]
- I request that the accusing officer's duly sworn statement of what happened between him and me, the defendant, on the night of June 17th, 2003 be put into evidence.
- I also request a copy of the statement and a few minutes to read it over while the officer reads it on the stand.
[Cross examine the officer:]
- Are you a peace officer?
- As a public officer, do you know you're presumed to know the law?
- Did you know public officers have immunity from prosecution or lawsuits for performing their lawful duties?
- Did you know public officers have no immunity from prosecution or lawsuits for stepping outside of their authority?
- Do you recall any incidents in your detainment of me on the night of June 17th, 2003 that may have been outside of your authority?
- Did you have authority to detain me? [Add Ill. cite]
- On what grounds?
- Did you have authority to arrest me?
- On what grounds?
- Did you have authority to handcuff me and take me to jail 20 miles away from my car?
- On what grounds?
- Why was I not put in jail in Belleville when you took me there that night?
- What did you and the staff say to each other there at the Belleville jail that night?
- Why did you ask me for money twice on the way to Belleville?
- Why did you first ask for $220, then later ask for $120?
- Why did you give me no copies of the tickets that I signed under duress at the jail?
- What branch of the government is your office under?
- What branch of the government is authorized to issue warrants or summons?
- What is required for a warrant, summons, or complaint to be lawful? [sig. & seal of judicial officer & sworn statement of complainant]
- Did the traffic citations you filled out for me on June 17th have the force and effect of law for a proper summons?
- Can your lawyer answer for you?
- Where is the signature and seal of a judicial officer and the sworn statement of the complainant?
- If the citations were not lawful judicial process, then my case must now be dismissed for lack of due process.
- I ask the court, on what grounds can I be held here now, without proper judicial summons?
- What are unalienable rights?
- Who owns the public roadways? [the public]
- Who has the unalienable right to travel on public roadways? [the public]
- Can unalienable rights be licensed or abridged? [no]
- Who owns my car when I have sole legal title to it? [I do]
- When would I be required to get myself or my car licensed and insured to use the public roadways? [when using them for hauling people or goods for profit]
- Is it true that anyone may use any means to travel that does not endanger anyone or anyone's property? This is part of the law that you are presumed to know.
- How does traveling in a car without license or insurance endanger anyone or property?
- Does the preamble to the Constitution say the purpose of the Constitution is partly to promote the general welfare of the people?
- Are the poor among the people whose welfare the Constitution is meant to support?
- How can the poor [which I declared under oath that I am] experience the unalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, if they cannot afford licenses, insurance, and numerous government fees for travel?
- Who has the right to take away from the poor the unalienable right to travel without licenses etc?
- Do you swear under oath that you did not deny me any of my rights during your detainment of me?
- Do you know I made a sworn statement that you denied me my Miranda rights during the detainment?
- Do you swear you did not deny my Miranda rights at that time?
- Do you know what constitutes a proper oath? [to affirm statements are true under penalty of perjury]
- Will you sign an oath to that effect?
- Would you agree to take a polygraph test on this matter?
- Do you have any regrets about how you treated me during your detaining of me on the night of June 17th?
- Do you believe you made any errors of proper procedure in the detainment?
- Did you forget to tell or ask me anything that night?
- Did you ask if I had children? If so, why?
- When I told you at the Brooklyn police station that the handcuffs were uncomfortable, did you say anything you should not have said?
- Did you say they're supposed to be uncomfortable?
- Which branch of government determines guilt or innocence of defendants?
- Which branch are you in?
- Were you stepping outside the scope of your authority by making that comment?
- Will you read for the court parts from the U.S. Constitution, Art. 3, Sections 2 & 3?
- What court has original jurisdiction in any case in which a state is a party?
- Who are the parties in my case?
- What's the difference between the People of the State of Illinois and the State of Illinois?
- Can the judge or prosecutor help out?
- I ask the court, is my case now dismissed?
- Do you respect my power as a U.S. citizen, even though I'm poor?
FSP Discussions
June 10, 2009 by lloyd
1. East India Co.; 2. Social Engineering; 3. Posner on JFK Assassination
* I discussed economics and history with Howard Katz last night at Murphy's in Manchester, NH. He said the British did more good than harm in their colonies. He said tariffs and national banks hurt economies.
* I'd like to get his reaction to these 2 articles.
The East India Company
http://india_resource.tripod.com/eastindia.html
FDR's anti-colonialism
http://american_almanac.tripod.com/lkffdr.htm
Howard's website is http://thegoldbug.net
* I'd also like to discuss this with liberty supporters.
EIR / Social Engineering
http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2007/2007_40-49/2007_40-49/2007-49/pdf/27-37_747-48.pdf
* Last week Joe at the Nashua Freedom Forum said he thinks Posner's findings that Oswald was the lone assassin of JFK are correct.
* But these articles seem to disprove Posner's claims.
http://karws.gso.uri.edu/JFK/the_critics/wrone/Review_of_Case_Closed.html
http://ratical.org/ratville/JFK/JohnJudge/posner.html
http://www.lawsch.uga.edu/academics/profiles/dwilkes_more/jfk_12coverup.html
http://assassinationscience.com/posner.html
5. Court 2
March 16, 2009 by lloyd
COURT PREPARATION
0a= - _Send Affidavit, Motions to Dismiss & Notice of Obstruction of Justice to the court.
0a=7-22 - _Ask clerk before the appearance to remind the judge to read your brief.
0b=7-14 - _www.objection.com: free download and practice.
0c=7-22 - LB: 0_Fast [Esther 4:13-16] _Pray for God to lead the judge to the right decision thru dreams. If you _love your opponent, you can appear in court boldly [1 John 4:17].
===<<1=7-14 - _Trick questions by the court can establish jurisdiction, such as the following: Is this the _motion you filed? Do you want a jury trial? Do you understand these charges? Answering yes or no allows the presumption of jurisdiction.>>
1a=My legal counsel said: Before answering any questions, demand that the Motion to dismiss be addressed by the court first, according to requirements of law, as per the following case law and statutes etc.
1a=23.11.. [1] Quote: For execution of process to confer jurisdiction of the person it must have been _issued from a court having jurisdiction of the subject matter. ----- Duncan v. Archie Brothers, et al. 344 SW 2d 398.
1a=26.6.. [2] Quote: Since jurisdiction is fundamental to any valid judicial proceeding, the first question that must be determined by a trial court in any case is that of jurisdiction. ----- Dillon v. Dillon, 187 P. 27
1a=26.8.. [3] Quote: There is no discretion to ignore lack of jurisdiction. -----
Joyce v. U.S. 474 F 2d 215.
1a=26.6.. [4] Quote: Since jurisdiction is fundamental, and it is jurisdiction alone that gives a court power to hear, determine, and pronounce judgment on the issues before it, jurisdiction must be continuing in the court throughout the proceedings. -----
Re. Cavitt, 254 P. 599.
1a=26.7.. [5] Quote: Challenge to court's jurisdiction is raised by motion to dismiss. ----- Criterion Ins. Co. v. State, 458 So. 2d. 22 [Fla 1st DCA 1984].
1a=[6] Quote: +++(725 ILCS 5/114-1) PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS - Motion to dismiss charge.+++ ___[a] Upon written _motion of defendant _prior to _trial before or after plea court may dismiss [if] ___[6] The court does not have _jurisdiction.
___[7] The county is an improper _place of trial.
___[8] The charge does not state an _offense. [There's no proper charge]
___[b] The court shall require _motion to dismiss be filed _after defendant [is] _arraigned.
___[c] If the _motion alleges _facts not of record _State shall file _answer admitting, or denying each allegation
___[d] When an issue of _fact is presented by a _motion to dismiss _court shall conduct a _hearing
___[d-5] subsection [a] [7] _defendant shall make _showing county is _improper _place of trial.
___Upon showing _State shall have _burden of proving county is proper place of trial.
1a=26.8.. [7] Quote: The _BURDEN shifts to the court to prove jurisdiction. ----- Rosemond v. Lambert, 469 F 2d 416.
1a=26.8.. [8] Quote: Court must _prove on the record all jurisdiction facts related to the jurisdiction asserted. ----- Lantana v. Hopper, 102 F. 2d 188;
Chicago v. New York 37 F. Supp. 150.
1a=7-22 - [9] Quote: *Federal Practice and Procedure, Sect. 3522: The parties cannot confer on a court jurisdiction that has not been vested in that court by the _Constitution and Congress.
1a= [10] Quote: Judges have _responsibility to insure that any person forced into court is there for proper reasons.*42 Federal Supplement 994, 998.
1a=27.21.. [11] Quote: Where a court fails to observe safeguards, it amounts to denial of due process of law, court is deprived of jurisdiction. -----
Merritt v. Hunter, 170 F. 2d 739.
1a=26.8.. [12] Quote: Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but, rather should dismiss the action. ----- Melo v. U.S., 505 F. 2d 1026.
1a=[13] U.S. Constitution, Art. 3, Sect. 1&2 says the U.S. Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in cases in which a state is a party.
<<1a=DEFENSES 8-2 - ED44: traffic ticket: privacy protection from the *4th Amend. and like mandates in the state Constitution to show the 'lack of jurisdiction' aka 'discretionary authority' for the stop.>>
<<1a=LTD.JURIS. - 14.17.. The legislature may define the "justiciable matter" in such a way to preclude or limit the authority of the circuit court. [citations] When a court's power to act is controlled by statute, the court is governed by the rules of limited jurisdiction [citations], and courts exercising jurisdiction over such matters must proceed within the strictures of the statute. ----- In re M.M., 156 Ill. 2d 53, 619 N.E. 2d 702 [1993].>>
<<1a=LTD.JURIS. - 14.17.. Special statutory jurisdiction is limited to the language of the act conferring it, and the court has no powers from any other source .... The authority of the court to make any order must be found in the statute. ----- Midland Coal Co. v. Know County, 268 Ill. App. 3d 485, 644 N.E. 2d 796 4 Dist. [1994].>>
===1b=<<PLEA 8-21 - LD: >> My legal counsel said: If you have made a plea, then _withdraw it. I have not made a plea, but the court seems to have made a plea for me, unlawfully. I withdraw the plea and I demand or Motion to dismiss this case on the following grounds: +++(725 ILCS 5/114-1) PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS - Motion to dismiss charge.+++
___[a] Upon written _motion of defendant _prior to _trial before or after plea court may dismiss [if] ___[6] The court does not have _jurisdiction.
___[7] The county is an improper _place of trial.
___[8] The charge does not state an _offense.
1b=My Motions show all 3 of these grounds: Lack of Jurisdiction; Improper Place of Trial; and There's no proper charge, so the "charge" does not state anything, including an offense.
1b=<<PLEA 7-14, 7-22 - _Say:>> I cannot plea until errors of procedure and of improper arraignment are corrected.
<<27.25 The challenge of jurisdiction must be answered. " Say >>
1b=The defendant is not mute or evasive with regard to plea, but the judge and plaintiff are evasive with regard to proving Subject Matter Jurisdiction.
1b=24.6 I insist that there can be no plea till the complaint is verified, as per
+++(725 ILCS 5/111-3) Charging an Offense. - Form of Charge.+++ [b] a Traffic _Ticket constitutes a complaint [unless] _defendant _requests _verified _complaint.
===1c=SUBMIT MOTIONS etc
1c=I submit a Notice of DISABILITY, a service connected disability from the Air Force <<8-19 - _Notice court of disability [to use recorder etc].>>
1c=As per ===Illinois Supreme Court Rules: ARTICLE II. +++Rule 298. _An application to defend as a _POOR person ===_I submit a Motion for this, which I wish now to read to the court.
1c=I also submit a BRIEF on Motor Vehicle Regulations.
1c=I now submit a Notice of OBSTRUCTION of Justice in the Instant Case.
<<1c=MOTIONS 7-14 - DMV Brief: www.reclaimyourpower.com/dmvbrief.htm: 7-14 - _Brief re Notice of Dismissal re Lack of Jurisdiction: www.familyguardian.tzo.com>>
<<1c=MOTIONS 7-14 - FF: Instead of Motions, make _Demands. Motions are general appearances and this grants jurisdiction >>
1d=As per Illinois Supreme Court Rules: ARTICLE II. +++Rule 218. Pretrial Procedure. a) Initial Case Management Conference+++ _court shall _hold case management _conference within _35 days after the parties are at issue, === I do not waive any of my rights, including the right to a pre-trial conference or hearing, which I request to be held at this time for a period of one hour.
1d=And, as per +++(625 ILCS 5/2-118) Hearings+++ _[d] _All hearings and _hearing _procedures shall _comply with requirements of the _Constitution, === I demand a Hearing or pre-trial conference to answer the averments of my Motions.
1d=And as per +++(725 ILCS 5/103-6) Waiver of Jury Trial.+++ Every defendant has right to _trial by _jury _unless [ii] _s/he fails to _demand it. ===Therefore, if the court ignores proper judicial procedure by not properly answering the averments of my Motions to Dismiss, then I would demand a trial by jury.
<<1d=" Say Defense has the right to discovery and than a pre-trial hearing. 27.28 Get a motion hearing set for motions. " Get an evidentiary hearing on the results of discovery questions, if needed. " Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim [under civil rules] or failure to make charges [under criminal rules].>>
===1e=As per +++(725 ILCS 5/111-6) Bill of Particulars.+++ _court may, on written _motion of the defendant, require State's Attorney to furnish _Bill of _Particulars, === I submit a Motion for a Bill of Particulars.
<<+++(725 ILCS 5/114-2) Motion for a bill of particulars.+++
___[a] written _motion for _bill of _particulars be filed _before or _after _arraignment
___specify particulars of the offense necessary to enable to prepare>>
1e=I request from the Prosecution verified complaints.
1e=I request also Certified Copies of Oaths of Office of all officers of the Court involved in my case.
1e= 7-22 - I'm told to request the following of all officers of the Court involved: 1- Does the officer have a claim against me? 2- Is the officer a Creditor or debtor to appear? 3- Value of the case 4- Using my name or property for profit? 5- Officer's phone number 6- Drivers license number 7- SSN 8- Bond requirements 9- Billing address 10- Home address 11- City 12- County 13- Property out of state 14- Private phone number 15- All property and accounts under his/her Esquire name
===<<2a=" Object if judge tries to set a trial date.>>
<<2a=27.29 If case goes to trial, demand a jury trial.>>
2a=As per my legal counsel, I Object to setting a trial date or continuance without first having a hearing on my Motions to Dismiss etc.
===<<2b=OBJECT - Failure to _object timely is fatal. Appeals are only based on objections.>>
<<2b=9.6 If no answer to challenge, object that it violates due process. 27.21 If plaintiff and judge don't answer challenge, ask what rules they're following. 27.23 Say Evasion is falsifying the record, which is criminal obstruction of justice.>>
2b=I object to the Court's evasion of my Motions to Dismiss, as this violates due process. Evasion is falsifying the record, which is criminal obstruction of justice. I demand to know what rules the Court is following.
2b=Failure to answer means the averments are presumed true.
2b=I demand answers and to know the grounds for proceeding without proving jurisdiction.
2b=Under our form of government public officers are political trustees and citizens are political trustors; are not trustees answerable to trustors? and, therefore, isn't it the duty of political trustees to answer citizens' questions about facts of governance?
===<<2c=CONTEMPT 7-22 - FF: You cannot get contempt for _asking a question. _www.frogfarm.org. >>
<<2c=[avoiceforchildren.com] If the judge threatens to charge Contempt of Court:>>
2c=_Ask Is it civil or criminal contempt?
2c=<<If criminal, _ask >> Who makes the claim? What is the crime? Who is the injured party?
<<2c_Wait for response. >>
2c=<<If civil, _ask >> Where is the contract between us? I don't agree to the terms of the contract.
<<2c=If the claimant is said to be the state, the judicial system, the court etc, _say>>
2c=You know only a person can make a claim, the state can't, and you know there is no injured party.
<<2c=QUESTIONS 7-22 - _Ask the court if anyone has a valid claim against Lloyd - August : Kinder.>>
===<<3=ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL 7-14 - *6th Amendment _Tell them >>
3=I cannot proceed without ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL.
<<3=7-27 FF: _www.jusbelli.com _Contract for Assistance of Counsel>>
<<3=DEFENSES 8-29 - LD: You cannot be jailed if [3] you did not have appointed _counsel, >>
3=As per +++(725 ILCS 5/114-4) Motion for continuance.+++ _[a] The defendant ... may move for a continuance. <<If the motion is made more than 30 days after arraignment [it] shall be in writing and supported by affidavit. >>
3= _[b] The motion is granted when: [2] [Defense counsel is] unable to prepare [3] material [defense] witness is unavailable...; or [4] [Defendant's condition prevents attendance]; or [5] ...Prejudice against defendant [in] the community; or [6] The amendment of a charge or bill of particulars has taken the defendant by surprise....
<<3*=8-21 LD: _Ask for a re-arraignment. _Demand the pre-trial rights that they should have told you about, like demurer.>>
<<3*=8-21 LD: If they did not Mirandize you, Use this _Suppression Motion: www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/5902.html to suppress that evidence. 8-29 [5] Without a _warrant, they violated your rights coming on your property. >>
3=I submit a Motion to Suppress all Evidence gained by plaintiff without the proper Miranda warning.
===<<4=+++(725 ILCS 5/114-3) Motion to discharge jury panel.+++ _[a] [This motion] shall be raised ... prior to the voir dire examination.>>
4=As per: ===ARTICLE II. +++Rule 234. Voir Dire Examination of Jurors and Cautionary Instructions+++ _The court shall _permit the parties [to make] direct _inquiry, === therefore, I demand to make direct inquiry of
the candidates for jury.
===<<+++Rule 235. Opening Statements+++ _the plaintiff may make an opening statement. the defendant may immediately follow _[See Order] Read _Affidavit >>
===<<6=Cross examine at End>>
===7=Read DISABILITY <<8-19 - LD: _Tell court about _phobias, if documented. >>
<<7a=OATHS 6-1 - LB: _Quo warranto is used to determine if a person holds office [cites]. It must show _harm is likely to come to the public [cite].
<7a=Respondent has _burden of proving his right to office [*State v. Murphy 148 SW 2d 527 and Burkett v. Ulmer, 15 A. 2d 858].
<7a=Where the officer steps outside his authority, the remedy is quo warranto [*State v. Prevatt, 148 So. 578].
<7a=The individual [_complainant] ... must show he has an interest in the question [cite].
<7a=7-14 Dean: Get _oaths of office of the cop, judge, prosecutor and clerk.>>
===7b=I wish to quote some important Law facts. 8.18.. The sole object and only legitimate end of government is to protect the citizen in the enjoyment of life, liberty, and property, and, when the government assumes other functions, it is usurpation and oppression. -----
City Council v. Kelly, 38 So., 67, 69; 142 Ala. 552 [1905].
7b=13.16.. Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them. -----
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491.
7b=13.16.. Law and court-made rules of expediency must not be placed above the constitution. ----- State v. Arregui, 44 Idaho 43, 254 P. 788, 52 A.L.R. 463.
7b=8.20.. A man may not barter away his life, freedom, or substantial rights
[Const. art. 1, para. 1].----- 176 A. 692, 693 [1935].
7b=20.5.. Every act of a state legislature repugnant to the Constitution is absolutely void. ----- Vanhorne's Lessee v. Dorance [F CC P] 2 U.S. 304, 1 L. Ed. 391.
7b=8-27-22 Right of personal passage: ----- 1 Tex Jur 2d [56] Highways, 235, p.765.
7b=23.10.. A citation to appear before a magistrate is not a court process, and it does not have legal efficacy of a warrant or summons. -----
Cr. Code Prac. Section 46. Duncan v. Archie Brothers, et al. 344 SW 2d 398.
<<7b=7-14 Dean _Reread the _citation. The _wrong *statute or the _wrong subparagraph may have been cited, making ticket void for vagueness. Check to see that there may be no _rule or regulation that implements the statute. >>
===7b=13.14 I demand that traffic reg. rules that apply to my case be put into evidence with certifying documentation.
7b=16.2 I Challenge the presumption of law re car traveler's need for drivers license.
7b=23.3 I Object on grounds that tickets are not judicial process. 23.13 Where is the seal and signature of the court officer? How can tickets be judicial process?
7b=24.4 I Demand to know the nature and cause of the accusation<<, or be presumed to know>>.
7b=24.5 Is the court following civil or criminal procedure?
===<<7c=DISCOVERY _7-22 - 25.9 Give notice of discovery.
<7c=25.11 If plaintiff does not answer or give documents, motion to compel them.
<7c=OBJECTIONS 7-14 - _Object to prosecutor's question being: leading, argumentative, based on hearsay, irrelevant, vague, requiring witness to draw a conclusion.>>
7c=27.2 I Object to irrelevant or evasive [27.8] answers etc and demand direct answers. 27.8 Evasion is obstruction of justice and criminal fraud.
<<7c=PROSECUTE OFFICIALS 8-3 - ED44: _send, frequently, certified mail to the FBI and Dept. of Justice as you proceed in your action.
<7c=CONTEMPT 7-22 - FF: When the court fights you, _say I'm going to make an Offer of Proof for my Appeal, also Offer into Evidence.
7c=<<If pressured, _ask >> Are you trying to Rush me to Judgment?
<<7c=7-22 - LB: attorneys bring in extraneous information via _motions and _briefs, to tilt the judge's mind. >>
===7d=7-14 - QUESTIONS - Doesn't a license only apply to those using the public roadways for gain?
7=<<Have the _court prove there was never a right to travel. Get on the _record these questions.>> Was there ever a right for citizens to use public roadways for non-commercial purposes without a license? When was this right revoked and for what express purpose?
7=7-22 What proof is there that my car must be insured?
7=What _documentation proves that lack of license or insurance increases highway accidents or endangers the public?
7=Aren't licenses based on the _presumption that travelers are engaged in commerce? Isn't _commerce the only lawful activity that can be licensed?
7=Was _traveling without a license ever lawful and constitutional in the past? _How and when did it become unlawful and unconstitutional?
7=7-27 When did it become okay to revoke unalienable rights such as right to travel?
7=7-25 What constitutional _amendment has specifically revoked this right? How can unalienable rights be revoked? They can't!
7=It's unbelievable that all users of public right-of-ways would be subject to commercial regulations.
<<7=Don't argue statutes; argue that your _rights have been infringed.>>
<<7=COURT RULES 7-14? - remember the rules don't apply to you, only to the court officers. When the judge enforces rules on you but not prosecutor, _yell: Substance over form! <7_Force them to keep coming back to real law of the Constitution and Statutes>>
<<7=DEFENSES 7-14 - _Declare self-insuring and _not responsible for license suspension for lack of notice. Traffic fines are usually *extortion.>>
===+++License (625 ILCS 5/6-101)
7___(a) No _person ... shall _drive [without] a valid license or permit
7___(d) any person in violation shall have motor vehicle immediately impounded [it doesn't say person shall be arrested, so cop exceeded authority = criminal misconduct]
+++Hearings. (625 ILCS 5/2-118)
7*___[a] _Upon the _suspension of license the _Secretary _shall _immediately _notify such person in writing
7___ _upon his written _request shall, within 20 days after receipt thereof, _set a date for a _hearing
===ARTICLE V.(1) +++Rule 551. Traffic ... Offenses for Which a Court Appearance is Required+++
7*_625 ILCS 5/3-707 _Operating Without Insurance
7*_625 ILCS 5/3-708 _Operating When Registration Suspended for Noninsurance
7*_625 ILCS 5/6-101 No Valid _Drivers License
===+++Rule 505. Notice to Accused.+++
7*___When issuing Uniform Citation _officer also _issue written _notice to _accused
+++Rule 222. _Discovery +++
+++Rule 61. CANON 1.+++
7*___Judge uphold _independence of _Judiciary [not let cop issue summons]
+++Rule 63. CANON 3.+++
7___[1] Judge perform duties impartially [3] be _patient [with disabled]
7___[4] Judge accord every person _right to be _heard
7___[8] Judge shall not manifest _bias or _prejudice [of] _disability, or _socio-economic status
+++(725 ILCS 5/101) Rule 101 - Summons ...+++
7*___The summons shall be issued under the _seal of the court, tested in the _name of the clerk, and _signed
+++(725 ILCS 5/103-1) - Rights of the Accused. - Rights on Arrest.+++
7___... [b] person making the _arrest shall _inform the person arrested of the nature of the _offense
+++(725 ILCS 5/107-2) [1] Arrest by Peace Officer.+++
7___peace officer may _arrest person when: [c] _reasonable _grounds believe person committing _offense
7*___[2] When peace officer arrests, officer shall _ [ask about any] _children under 18
+++(725 ILCS 5/107-9) Issuance of arrest warrant upon complaint.+++
7*___[a] When a _complaint is presented to a court ... it shall _examine upon _oath the _complainant
7*___[b] The _complaint shall be in writing and shall: [2] State the offense [4] Be subscribed and _sworn to by the complainant.
+++(725 ILCS 5/107-11) When summons may be issued.
7___[a] When authroized to issue a warrant of arrest, a court may instead issue a summons.
7*___[b] The _summons shall ... [3] Set forth the nature of the offense; ... [5] Be _signed by the _judge of the court with the title of his or her office ....
+++(725 ILCS 5/111-3) Charging an Offense. - Form of Charge.+++
7___[3] [nature and elements of the offenses charged]
7*___[c] When State seeks _enhanced _sentence for prior conviction .... Section 5-5-1 of the "unified Code of Corrections" the alleged fact must be _included in the _charging _instrument or written _notification _before _trial, submitted to a trier of fact as an aggravating factor, and _proved beyond a reasonable doubt....
+++(725 ILCS 5/111-6) Bill of Particulars.+++
7*___At the trial of the cause the _state's _evidence shall be _confined to the particulars of the bill.
===8=Closing Statement
8=The Declaration of Independence relates that the reason for the declaration was a long train of government abuses. About a third of the people of the U.S. during and after the Revolution remained loyal to Britain's abusive system. Another third were only half-hearted supporters of the new government. These elements soon gained power and gradually subverted the American system, preventing efforts to end slavery by 1810 etc, until the abuses by 1970 had become nearly as great as those that led to our independence.
8=4TH BRANCH - 11.5.. The headless fourth branch of government [was alluded to by U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Jackson in 1952. ----- Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co. 343 U.S. 470, 487, 72 W. Ct. 800, 810, 96 L. Ed. 1081. - 12.8-9.. The 1937 Brownless Report concluded that federal administrative agencies had become a "headless 'fourth branch' of government, a haphazard collection of irresponsible agencies and uncoordinated powers." ----- FDR's 1937 "President's Committee on Administrative Management, Report with Special Studies," known as the "Brownless Report."
8=LAWYERS - 30.1.. 75-90% of American trial lawyers are incompetent, dishonest, or both. ----- Warren Burger, Former Chief Justice, U.S. Supreme Court
8=In studying the law to learn to defend myself, in the event that I do not find assistance of competent counsel who can accompany me in court, I learned that abuses in government seem to be mounting, as evidenced by increasing adoption of presumptions of law. I've also learned abuses from the news media, as in the fact that the U.S. prison population per capita is among the highest in the world and that Governor Ryan pardoned numerous Illinois prisoners because he concluded that they did not receive fair trials. The fact that such abuses are made public is encouraging, because it makes possible improvement.
8=I encountered abusive elders in my childhood. Thankfully, parent abuse has become public knowledge and the problem seems to be gradually ebbing. Likewise, society is finding ways to help addicts, including alcoholics, recover from addiction. The courts have been getting better, I think, at helping to pressure addicts into treatment. As M. Scott Peck said in his book, People of the Lie, people in successful groups tend to develop pride and the attitude that they cannot be wrong. Pride prevents group self-examination, but it's only by such self-examination that groups can correct their wrongs. I've been in recovery myself for many years from obsessive-compulsive disorder and I've learned the value of humility. I hope to encourage those in government to learn the value of humility and group self-examination.
8=I am a poor person with a service-connected disability and I cannot afford to pay a big fine, for supposedly driving with a suspended drivers license and without a discovered insurance card in my brother's car, which I was traveling in. It seems unfair to me that I should be fined when the license was said to be suspended for only 4 days and without my knowledge, since I received no Notice that it was about to be suspended and for what reason. It seems especially unfair since I was not driving the car for gain, but should have the unalienable right to travel on public roadways, as explained by numerous averments in my Motions to Dismiss.
===9=COURT RECORDS - 8-18 Get the _audio court transcript & written. 7-14 _Get certified copies each day or week. _Purchase the transcript and the audio for about $10 for the tape. [Get it free as poor person?].
9=8-18 _Read the record before the reporter submits it and get any mistakes corrected.
9=Check the _register of actions. The clerk keeps a record of everything that happens.
9=_Check for contradictory statements over time.
<<9=A _court recorder can make a _declaration that the record is true and correct, swearing before someone who can administer an oath.
<9=DEFENSES - You cannot be jailed if [4] they cannot give you a _transcript. >>
===9=Challenge the transcript alterations and _subpoena the jury as witnesses to what was said. In a hearing to challenge the record, _subpoena the witness that the record is in question about.
9=The clerk and court reporter might make your best _witnesses.
9=If they change your transcript, file a _NOTICE OF CORRECTION OF RECORD, and if the opposition objects, _ask for the recording to be put on the record. The response will be silence.
9=f you think the transcript is altered, _subpoena the reporter AND the notes and recordings of the reporter.
9=If the judge turns you down, file a civil _lawsuit against the judge.
+++Rule 71 - Violation of Rules+++
9___Judge who violates may be subject to discipline by Courts Commission.
+++(725 ILCS 5/103-1) - Rights of the Accused. - Rights on Arrest.+++
9___... [h] Any peace officer who fails to comply is guilty of official _misconduct
===<<6=Cross examine>>
I request that the accusing officer's duly sworn statement of what happened between him and me, the defendant, on the night of June 17th, 2003 be put into evidence. I also request a copy of the statement and a few minutes to read it over while the officer reads it on the stand.
<<Cross examine the officer:>> Are you a peace officer?
As a public officer, do you know you're presumed to know the law?
Did you know public officers have immunity from prosecution or lawsuits for performing their lawful duties?
Did you know public officers have no immunity from prosecution or lawsuits for stepping outside of their authority?
Do you recall any incidents in your detention of me on the night of June 17th, 2003 that may have been outside of your authority?
Did you have authority to detain me? [Add Ill. cite]
On what constitutional grounds?
Did you have authority to arrest me?
On what constitutional grounds?
Did you have authority to handcuff me and take me to jail 20 miles away from my car?
On what constitutional grounds?
Why was I not put in jail in Belleville when you took me there that night?
What did you and the staff say to each other there at the Belleville jail that night?
===Why did you ask me for money twice on the way to Belleville?
Why did you first ask for $220, then later ask for $120?
Why did you give me no copies of the tickets that I signed under duress at the jail?
What branch of the government is your office under?
What branch of the government is authorized to issue warrants or summons?
What is required for a warrant, summons, or complaint to be lawful? [sig. & seal of judicial officer & sworn statement of complainant]
Did the traffic citations you filled out for me on June 17th have the force and effect of law for a proper summons?
Can your lawyer answer for you?
Where is the signature and seal of a judicial officer and the sworn statement of the complainant?
If the citations were not lawful judicial process, can my case now be dismissed?
On what grounds can I be held here now, without proper judicial summons?
===What are unalienable rights?
Who owns the public roadways? [the public]
Who has the unalienable right to travel on public roadways? [the public]
Can unalienable rights be licensed or abridged? [no]
Who owns my car when I have sole legal title to it? [I do]
When would I be required to get myself or my car licensed and insured to use the public roadways? [when using them for hauling people or goods for profit]
Is it true that anyone may use any means to travel that does not endanger anyone or anyone's property? This is part of the law that you are presumed to know.
How does traveling in a car without license or insurance endanger anyone or property?
Does the preamble to the Constitution say the purpose of the Constitution is partly to promote the general welfare of the people?
Are the poor among the people whose welfare the Constitution is meant to support?
How can the poor [which I declared under oath that I am] experience the unalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, if they cannot afford licenses, insurance, and numerous government fees for travel?
Who has the right to take away from the poor the unalienable right to travel without licenses etc?
===Do you swear under oath that you did not deny me any of my rights during your detainment of me?
Do you know I made a sworn statement that you denied me my Miranda rights during the detainment?
Do you swear you did not deny my Miranda rights at that time?
Do you know what constitutes a proper oath? [to affirm statements are true under penalty of perjury]
Will you sign an oath to that effect?
Would you agree to take a polygraph test on this matter?
===Do you have any regrets about how you treated me during your detaining of me on the night of June 17th?
Do you believe you made any errors of proper procedure in the detainment?
Did you forget to tell or ask me anything that night?
Did you ask if I had children? If so, why?
When I told you at the Brooklyn police station that the handcuffs were uncomfortable, did you say anything you should not have said?
Did you say they're supposed to be uncomfortable?
Which branch of government determines guilt or innocence of defendants?
Which branch are you in?
Were you stepping outside the scope of your authority by making that comment?
Will you read for the court parts from the U.S. Constitution, Art. 3, Sections 2 & 3?
What court has original jurisdiction in any case in which a state is a party?
Who are the parties in my case?
What's the difference between the People of the State of Illinois and the State of Illinois?
Can the judge or prosecutor help out?
Is my case now dismissed?
Do you respect my power as a U.S. citizen, even though I'm poor?
Re: 5. Court 1
March 16, 2009 by lloyd
(IMPROPER PLACE OF TRIAL)
__________________________________________________________________________________
SWORN MOTION TO DISMISS BECAUSE THE COUNTY OF ST. CLAIR, ILLINOIS IS AN IMPROPER PLACE OF TRIAL
I, LLOYD KINDER, hereinafter ACCUSED, one of the holders of the inherent political power, as per Article 1, Section 1 of the Constitution of the State of Illinois, bring sworn motion to dismiss the above-shown complaints, styled as Uniform Traffic Tickets, hereinafter UTT/s, on grounds the county of St. Clair is an improper place of trial and on grounds the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.
1. On June 17, 2003 ACCUSED was ticketed and arrested, allegedly for having a suspended driver's license, as per above-shown UTTs and, therefore, is afraid to drive to court.
2. ACCUSED's driver's license was said to be suspended for only four days, from June 14tth till June 17th, at time of arrest, well within a fair grace period and ACCUSED was not informed by anyone of a pending suspension of driver's license in advance and therefore was not given any reasons for said suspension and had no knowledge of same.
3. ACCUSED is an unemployed, disabled Vietnam Veteran, living in poverty with a very small pension.
4. There are no buses or other means of affordable transportation from ACCUSED's home [in Golden Eagle, Illinois in rural Calhoun County, west of Jersey County] to St. Clair County.
5. ACCUSED was falsely arrested, threatened and mistreated by the arresting officer, hereinafter COMPLAINANT, [about 10 p.m. till 11 p.m. on June 17th, 2003 from Brooklyn, Illinois to the Belleville, Illinois jail where personnel seemed to say imprisonment may be improper, so ACCUSED was released there], thus making ACCUSED fearful of returning to the area and encountering COMPLAINANT, or friends of COMPLAINANT.
6. If ACCUSED is forced to appear for hearing, thus facing further hardships [from the expense of travel by taxi or dangers of hitchhiking] and prospects of destitution, due to unjust fines and fees, and prospects of encountering abusive people, such as COMPLAINANT or friends of COMPLAINANT, ACCUSED will feel obligated to file, firstly, civil suit and later, if needed, criminal suit, against COMPLAINANT for false arrest and abuse, and also against the prosecutor and the judge for criminal misconduct, obstruction of justice, simulating judicial process and therein falsifying court records, since traffic court is ad hoc summary proceedings, using neither civil nor criminal Rules of Procedure in their entirety and denying plenary due process of law.
THEREFORE, pursuant to Article 114, Section 1 (a) (7) and 1 (a) (6) of the Code of Criminal Procedures of 1963 [725 ILCS 5/], which states:
"(a) Upon the written motion of the defendant made prior to trial before or after a plea has been entered the court may dismiss the indictment, information or complaint upon any of the following grounds:"
"(7) The county is an improper place of trial" [as explained above], and
"(6) The court in which the charge has been filed does not have jurisdiction" [See SWORN MOTION TO DISMISS FOR WANT OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION hereinafter.] Therefore, the instant case and complaints against ACCUSED must be dismissed.
Submitted on July __, 2003
__________________________________________
LLOYD KINDER,
[street]
Golden Eagle,
IL
[phone]
Under penalties of perjury, I, LLOYD KINDER, declare that I have read the foregoing motion and have personal knowledge of the facts and matters therein set forth and averred and that each and all of these facts and matters are true and correct.
Re: 5. Court 1
March 16, 2009 by lloyd
(OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT - OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE)
_____________________________________________________________________________
ACTUAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN THE INSTANT CASE
I, Lloyd Kinder, hereinafter ACCUSED, and one of the holders of the inherent political power, present this actual and constructive notice of obstruction of justice in the instant case to wit:
1. On July __, 2003, ACCUSED has filed his Sworn Motion to Dismiss on Grounds the County Is an Improper Place of Trial and Sworn Motion to Dismiss for Want of Subject Matter Jurisdiction with the Clerk of Court.
2. The officers of the above-styled court to include the judge and prosecutor are under solemn duty and obligation as state political trustees pursuant to their only authority under the Constitution of the State of Illinois, a.k.a. political trust, to duly answer/traverse each and every averment of the above-named motion.
3. In American courtrooms there can be no double standard of law, wherefore, no officer of the above-styled court may hold silent or answer evasively when the subject matter jurisdiction of said court is challenged. Instead, the judge and the prosecutor are under a solemn duty as public office holders, a.k.a. state political trustees pursuant to the above-said political trust instrument, a.k.a. the Illinois Constitution, to duly answer each averment of the above-referenced motion to dismiss and, if anyone denies any said averment is true, he/she has a mandatory constitutional obligation to answer/traverse each averment with counter arguments grounded in the political law of the State of Illinois and the nation, which is to say the constitutional law, wherein each answer shall be specifically applicable to the averment he/she is answering.
4. If said judge or prosecutor holds silent or answers evasively to any one or several of these averments, he shall be guilty of falsifying the record of the instant proceedings, a criminal offense as well as a violation of the common law of the people of the State of Illinois, and shall not be able to raise the affirmative defense of absolute judicial or prosecutorial immunity nor the affirmative defense of having no knowledge of the people's common law and constitutional law in these matters.
5. If the judge shall issue rulings based upon the falsified records created by holding silent or answering evasively to ACCUSED's averments in the above-referenced motion, then he shall be guilty of simulating legal process in the instant proceedings and violation of his solemn oath of office.
6. In the event that officers of the above-styled court shall be chargeable with violating Illinois Statutes as a matter of willful obstruction of justice in the event that the above-referenced motion is not duly answered according to the law of the land and whereas ACCUSED recognizes that prosecutors may be loathe to accept a criminal complaint from ACCUSED pertaining to the matter so arising; therefore, ACCUSED will raise these criminal charges civilly by filing of a civil complaint.
7. And further, ACCUSED will later also file a violation of civil rights complaint, a.k.a. "Title 42," first in state court and then in federal court, complaining of civil rights violations in consequence of acts of obstruction of justice and related criminal acts arising from exceeding the authority of their state offices, and ACCUSED's unabridgeable right to plenary substantive and procedural due process. Said civil rights complaints will incorporate any further obstruction of justice and civil rights violations which may arise in consequence of failure of defendant parties or their attorneys to forthrightly deal with the averments in the above-said motion.
WHEREFORE, no state public office holder, a.k.a. political trustee, no matter the nature of his/her official duties of his/her afore-said public office, a.k.a. state political trust, may hereafter argue he/she is not on actual and constructive notice of the foregoing matters, does not have knowledge of these matters regarding his/her duty to duly answer the instant challenge of the above-styled court's presumption of subject-matter jurisdiction, nor be able to argue he/she does not understand there can be no affirmative defense of absolute judicial immunity, nor absolute prosecutorial immunity, as the case may be, if he/she cannot prove the above-styled court proceeds instantly as a judicial office pursuant to judicial authority to the State of Illinois by duly disproving the averments of the above-referenced motion to dismiss by making political law, a.k.a. constitutional law, arguments proving ACCUSED's averments in ACCUSED's above-referenced motion are false.
AND WHEREFORE, neither shall any judge or prosecutor in the instant case be able subsequently to make any constitutional law argument that he/she has absolute immunity which permits him/her to avoid and ignore this notice and its subject matter and the above- referenced motion which is the subject of this notice, or that he/she has absolute immunity from the consequences of avoiding and ignoring this notice and said motion either officially or personally, because absolutely nothing is established that the above-styled court has subject matter jurisdiction to proceed against ACCUSED, if the averments of the above-referenced motion to dismiss cannot be constitutionally proven to be false.
AND FURTHERMORE, all process and proceedings which may issue subsequently in the name of the State of Illinois without first showing in the record this is a judicial proceeding and the nature and cause of this proceeding are null and void, ab initio, and said court has no authority to do anything more than dismiss this case with prejudice.
Submitted on July __, 2003
____________________________________
Lloyd Kinder,
[street]
Brussels, IL
[phone]
___________________________________________
Re: 5. Court 1
March 16, 2009 by lloyd
(MOTION TO DISMISS - LACK OF JURISDICTION)
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT,
ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS, TRAFFIC DIVISION
STATE OF ILLINOIS,
Plaintiff in error
v. ILLINOIS UNIFORM TRAFFIC TICKETS:
03TR37840, 37841, 37842, 37843, 37844, 37845
LLOYD KINDER,
Defendant in error.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
SWORN MOTION TO DISMISS FOR WANT OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
I, Lloyd Kinder, hereinafter ACCUSED, and one of the holders of the inherent political power[1], bring sworn motion to dismiss the six above-shown Uniform Traffic Tickets, hereinafter UTTs, for want of subject matter jurisdiction of the above-styled court and expect an answer to this challenge by receiving specific answers to each of the numbered averments hereinafter. Public officials connected with the instant case, take notice.
WHEREAS, upon making ACCUSED's afore-said challenge, afore- said public officials are under a mandatory duty and obligation to answer ACCUSED's challenge;
AND WHEREAS, if state public officials have facts to support their presumptions of subject matter jurisdiction in the instant case, they must show those facts here and now, otherwise, they are admitting that the averments herein are true and that they have no subject matter jurisdiction in the instant case;
AND WHEREAS evasive answers to the averments herein have the same effect as no answers;
AS GROUNDS IN SUPPORT OF CHALLENGE, ACCUSED makes the below numbered sworn averments that the above-styled STATE OF ILLINOIS has no standing to sue or otherwise prosecute in the instant case, for want of jurisdictional prerequisites and for want of a proper cause for each of the afore-said UTTs, wherein are cited mere naked statute instead. As made clear by the political, material, and jurisdictional undisputed facts averred below, there are no causes of action, to include jurisdictional prerequisite averments, expressed in the above- shown UTTs, upon which invocation of the jurisdiction of the above- styled court can be established, namely:
1 It is an undisputed fact that the purpose of government is to protect the inalienable rights of the people and that the people create their government with specified limited powers enumerated in their constitution.s
2 It is an undisputed fact that pursuant to their unwritten constitution the people have no power to derogate their unalienable rights, including the right to plenary due process of law, even by language in their written constitutions.
3 It is an undisputed fact that no supreme court has official authority to derogate the people's inalienable rights, including the right to plenary due process of law.
4. It is an undisputed fact that the Illinois Legislature has no authority to create new offices of government, or to delegate powers to said offices, if that authority is not expressly granted to the Legislature by the people in their state Constitution, as the people's will and intent, which authority is not so granted.
5. It is an undisputed fact that, if the Legislature did have power to create an agency, the Legislature must exercise legislative oversight over its agency creature/s, to include legislative directives as provisions of the Illinois Administrative Procedures Act [APA] by which such agency must promulgate rules that evidence the will and intent of the Legislature as per statutes regarding what classes of subjects or objects said provisions are to apply, and only in this manner may said provisions have the "force and effect of law."
6. It is an undisputed fact that the above-shown UTTs cite mere naked statutes, not promulgated rules, naming a class of activities regulatable and a class of persons subject to said regulation.
7. It is an undisputed fact that any Circuit Court of the State of Illinois, when hearing violations of the Illinois Vehicle Code, follows neither the Rules of Civil Procedure nor the Rules of Criminal Procedure in their entirety.
8. It is an undisputed fact that the afore-referenced UTTs are neither civil nor criminal judicial process, hence do not invoke either a civil or criminal jurisdiction, hence on this ground alone, the above-styled court cannot hear or rule on any issues related to the above-shown UTTs in any judicial capacity, since judicial process must be either civil or criminal.
9. It is an undisputed fact that no court of the State of Illinois has subject matter jurisdiction for administrative law violations, if the accused person is not subject to an administrative agency's jurisdiction in the first place.
10. It is an undisputed fact that "a person," as described in the IVC, is too vague a term to have the force and effect of law, as it does not describe a class of persons.
11. It is an undisputed fact that ACCUSED, prima facie, was engaged in no activity regulated or regulatable by the Illinois Vehicle Code at the time of being stopped on June 17, 2003, which stop is described in ACCUSED's affidavit, filed with the above- referenced court on July .., 2003.
SWORN MOTION TO DISMISS FOR WANT OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
[signed] _¬¬_____________________
Page 1 of 3
12. It is an undisputed fact that the right to travel is an inalienable right and that no inalienable right may be converted into a privilege, requiring a license, etc.
13. It is an undisputed fact that COMPLAINANT, while charging ACCUSED with violating Illinois Statutes, had no lawful basis for charging ACCUSED for want of probable cause to believe ACCUSED was engaged in any regulatable activity
14 It is an undisputed fact that no officer/s of the legislative, executive, or judicial branches of the state government have authority to derogate the people's right to answer only to duly sworn complaints, when charged with violating any law.
15 It is an undisputed fact that the people, even as holders of the inherent political power, have no power to delegate authority to any officers of any branch or department of the government to derogate the people's right to due process, including the right to answer only to duly sworn complaints, when charged with violating any law.
16 It is an undisputed fact that the alleged charges were made on the above-shown UTTs, not pursuant to any published rules for either civil or criminal matters cognizable in a judicial power court of the people's judicial branch of government.
17 It is an undisputed fact that any manner of complaint alleging criminal wrongdoing by a citizen is mere hearsay, if complainant does not swear a proper oath before a person duly authorized to hear such oaths.
18 It is an undisputed fact that any complaints of criminal wrongdoing, wherein the accusation or complaint is merely certified, affirmed, or believed, and not properly sworn to are not proper complaints with the "force and effect of law."
19. It is an undisputed fact that UTTs are not judicial process for want of issuance with seal and signature by a judicial officer.
20 It is an undisputed fact that no citizen may be charged with any manner of crime, except by complaint duly sworn before an officer authorized to take oaths.
21 It is an undisputed fact that the above-shown UTTs are unverified accusations, hence are void due process and violation of ACCUSED's fundamental due process rights to answer only to sworn accusations.
22 It is an undisputed fact that COMPLAINANT falsifies the record by filing the above-shown UTTs with the clerk of the above- styled court with full knowledge they are to be processed as if they were duly sworn criminal complaints initiating judicial process in a court of the State of Illinois.
23 It is an undisputed fact that no civil proceeding can commence in a court of the State of Illinois until the accused is served a civil summons and no criminal proceeding can commence until the defendant is served a criminal summons, a sworn complaint, or a warrant for arrest.
24 It is an undisputed fact that UTTs are neither judicially issued civil or criminal summons nor judicially issued arrest warrants nor properly sworn complaints.
25 It is an undisputed fact that neither a civil nor criminal proceeding is commenced in the instant case for failure of said UTTs to meet requirements of either judicial process.
26 It is an undisputed fact that no state public officer has authority to delegate any judicial power to any officer or agent of the executive branch and consequently COMPLAINANT had no authority to issue UTTs as judicial summons.
27 It is an undisputed fact that UTTs cite provisions from the Illinois Compiled Statutes, which statutes are not official, duly enacted law, but only evidence of law, and which have no "force and effect of law."
28 It is an undisputed fact that, pursuant to the Illinois Administrative Procedures Act, rules of the Illinois Vehicle Code [IVC] must express the intent of the Illinois Legislature regarding who and what are the subjects and objects of each administrative law, including traffic laws.
29 It is an undisputed fact that COMPLAINANT cited no such rules of the IVC for failure of IVC to promulgate said rules. 30 It is an undisputed fact that citing mere statutes does not constitute notice that anyone or anything is subject to said naked statutes for want of rules showing legislative intent.
31 It is an undisputed fact that "a person", as per IVC, does not describe any class of persons subject to IVC, and "driver/s," referring to "operators of motor carriers for hire," is not a class to which ACCUSED belonged.
32. It is an undisputed fact that the a nexus between ACCUSED and the IVC must exist before the afore-said statutes might have the "force and effect of law" and the nexus does not exist, if no promulgated rule can be cited in support of the statutes.
33. It is an undisputed fact that revised statutes are only evidence of law, not the law itself, and UTTs cite only revised statutes, not duly enacted laws.
34. It is an undisputed fact that the proceedings in the instant case are being conducted as ad hoc summary proceedings against ACCUSED, wherein the rules of court are known only to the court and the prosecution and ACCUSED's due process of law rights are being violated in toto in the instant case in both form and substance, wherein proceedings are being conducted solely upon hearsay evidence, presumptions of law and presumptions of jurisdiction, which presumptions upon challenge must be demonstrated, or the case dismissed.
35 It is an undisputed fact that the people of Illinois have authorized a system of judicial power courts in Article 6 of the Illinois Constitution, but are silent regarding creation of courts of limited jurisdiction and, as per Article 4 regarding The Legislature, are also silent regarding delegating authority to the Legislature to create courts of limited jurisdiction, including traffic courts.
36 It is an undisputed fact that, when Illinois courts function as traffic courts, they proceed not as courts of general jurisdiction, but as courts of limited jurisdiction.
SWORN MOTION TO DISMISS FOR WANT OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
[signed] _¬¬_____________________
Page 2 of 3
37 It is an undisputed fact that the Illinois Legislature has enacted no law authorizing Illinois Circuit Courts to function as courts of limited jurisdiction.
38 It is an undisputed fact that no Illinois Circuit Court is constitutionally empowered to conduct a judicial proceeding on an administrative summons or complaint.
39 It is an undisputed fact that UTTs are a form of administrative process and not judicial process in form or substance.
40 It is an undisputed fact that the above-styled court has a mandatory duty and obligation to answer/traverse the challenge raised in the instant motion by either properly admitting or properly denying each individual averment and for any averments that are denied there must be constitutional law arguments in answer/traverse, which refute said averments.
41 It is an undisputed fact that, if any averment of the instant motion is not properly and lawfully answered, the above-styled court denies ACCUSED's fundamental rights to substantive and procedural due process, whereupon the court loses subject matter jurisdiction to proceed and must dismiss forthwith.
42 It is an undisputed fact that, if any of the averments of this motion are answered by silence or evasion by the judge and/or prosecutor in the instant case, then each such act of the judge and/or prosecutor shall be an act of criminally falsifying the record.
43 It is an undisputed fact that, if the judge in the instant case shall issue any ruling, other than an order to dismiss, then each such ruling shall be a separate act/count of criminally simulating legal process.
44 It is an undisputed fact that, if the averments of this motion can only be answered in the affirmative, then this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and must dismiss the instant case.
45 It is an undisputed fact that any averments of the instant motion that are affirmed and prove failure of due process or want of subject matter jurisdiction must result in immediate dismissal of the instant case.
46 It is an undisputed fact that, if any averment of this motion cannot be answered, the judge and/or prosecutor is admitting incompetence of the court and must dismiss the instant case, notwithstanding the presumption must hold that officers of the court know the law and know they are committing criminal obstruction of justice and felonious misconduct in office, when they proceed without properly answering averments of the instant motion.
WHEREFORE, pursuant to Article 1, Sections 1, 2 and 24 of the Constitution of the State of Illinois and the "equal protection of the law" clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and as further evidenced in Miranda v. Arizona, and elsewhere in the people's common law, this demand is made timely and the foregoing factual matters, averments 1 through 46, must be deemed admitted as true as a matter of duty and obligation by the judge, prosecutor and accusing officer pursuant to their political trusteeship, unless specifically denied by the prosecution by verified statements of verifiable facts.
AND, for all of the foregoing undisputed political, material, and jurisdictional facts above stated, averments 1 through 46, it is undisputed that no judicial or prosecutorial authority exists in the instant case, nor authority to have issued the above-shown UTTs in the first place.
THEREFORE, upon the face of the record, it is undisputed that the allegations of the accusing officer in the above-styled action, issuing of UTTs, are fundamentally and substantively defective on their face for want of subject matter jurisdiction, hence in consequence of the foregoing undisputed political, material and jurisdictional facts, the above-styled Illinois Uniform Traffic Tickets and case must be dismissed
Submitted on July __, 2003.
_________________________________
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing motion and have personal knowledge of the facts and matters therein set forth and averred and that each and all of these facts and matters stated in it are true and correct.
_________________________________
Lloyd Kinder,
[street]
Brussels, IL
[phone]
SWORN MOTION TO DISMISS FOR WANT OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
Page 3 of 3
5. Court 1
March 16, 2009 by lloyd
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT,
ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS, TRAFFIC DIVISION
STATE OF ILLINOIS,
Plaintiff in error
v. ILLINOIS UNIFORM TRAFFIC TICKETS:
03TR37840, 37841, 37842, 37843, 37844, 37845
LLOYD KINDER,
Defendant in error.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
AFFIDAVIT BY LLOYD KINDER OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL IN THE INSTANT CASE
State of Illinois )
) S.S.
County of St. Clair )
I, LLOYD KINDER, hereinafter AFFIANT, have first hand knowledge of the undisputed material herein, am competent to testify in these matters and affirm that this undisputed material is true and correct.
1. On June 17, 2003 at about 10 p.m., AFFIANT was driving north on Route 3 in AFFIANT'S brother's car, when AFFIANT was stopped in or near Brooklyn, Illinois by Brooklyn police officer, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, hereinafter COMPLAINANT, for a non-functioning right tail light.
2. COMPLAINANT took AFFIANT's brother's car insurance card and AFFIANT'S driver's license and left AFFIANT waiting for twenty minutes or more, then returned and said to the effect: You're under arrest for driving with a suspended license; come out of the car.
3. AFFIANT was surprised and confused to be told the driver's license was suspended, since it had just been renewed in January and was not to expire for a few years thereafter and AFFIANT was shocked and fearful of being arrested without having committed any crime and asked: Why are you saying it's suspended?, to which COMPLAINANT failed to respond with any statement as to the nature and cause of the accusation.
4. AFFIANT stepped out of the car after being told to leave the keys in the ignition. Then COMPLAINANT asked if AFFIANT was drunk or something, to which AFFIANT replied: No, I'm tired. Then COMPLAINANT put handcuffs on AFFIANT's hands behind the back without first informing AFFIANT of AFFIANT's rights.
5. AFFIANT felt disturbed and fearful as COMPLAINANT patted down AFFIANT's clothes.
6. As COMPLAINANT took AFFIANT to the Brooklyn police station, COMPLAINANT asked if AFFIANT had $220 and AFFIANT replied No.
7. Getting out of the police car at the police station with hands still cuffed behind the back, AFFIANT bumped and hurt the right knee. In the police station COMPLAINANT asked questions about AFFIANT being homosexual, suicidal, a weakling etc, still without informing AFFIANT of rights to remain silent etc.
8. COMPLAINANT allowed AFFIANT to have one handcuff off to use the restroom before returning to the police car to go to the Belleville, Illinois jail. When the handcuffs were put back on before entering the police car, AFFIANT said they were uncomfortable and asked that they be put on more comfortably. COMPLAINANT said it's supposed to be uncomfortable, suggesting that AFFIANT deserved punishment before even being tried for any crime, but COMPLAINANT did then reluctantly readjust the handcuffs.
9. On the way to the Belleville jail, before or after stopping briefly to see about a bus that had been hit by a rental car, COMPLAINANT sped down back streets to avoid a train and then asked again if AFFIANT had money, this time $120, instead of $220.
10. After arriving at the Belleville jail COMPLAINANT spoke with staff there, who apparently convinced COMPLAINANT that arrest and imprisonment may be improper for a possible suspended license, so AFFIANT was released after being told to sign about five forms. AFFIANT did not read the forms before signing them, due to fear of imprisonment. COMPLAINANT abandoned AFFIANT at the Belleville jail without leaving a copy of the traffic ticket. Jail staff had to call someone to get information for AFFIANT as to the time and place of hearing.
11. After walking a long way with a bad left foot to find a motel, AFFIANT could not afford the price, and after looking for and failing to find a cheaper motel, AFFIANT was left to walking back after midnight to AFFIANT's brother's impounded car in Madison, Illinois, near Brooklyn, some 20 miles from Belleville. After having made a sign and walking with sore feet and knees about another 2 miles north on Rt. 159 at about 2:30 a.m., a young black male, named probably Rich, who lived on Old Collinsville Road in Fairview Heights, just north of Belleville, gave AFFIANT a ride to Madison, where AFFIANT slept a few hours in an old pickup truck.
12. When AFFIANT inquired soon thereafter about the impounded car at Andy's Towing in Madison, AFFIANT was told to get a release order from the Brooklyn police department first. So AFFIANT walked another mile or two to the Brooklyn police station and was given a ride back to Andy's by a police officer.
13. After waiting two or three hours for AFFIANT'S brother to bring money and drive the car, AFFIANT found that a compact disk on the right front seat was missing.
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing statements of this affidavit and that the facts stated therein are true and correct.
_____________________________________________________
Signed Date
Lloyd Kinder,
[street]
Brussels, IL
[phone]
PLAN PWW
February 16, 2009 by lloyd
PLAN PWW
- General Plan: PWW: Project Win-Win
Goal: World governments adopt WWP: win-win process
1-ORGANIZE PWW HQ
2-BUILD CHAPTERS
3-HOLD CONFERENCES
4-LOBBY
- Purposes
1-ORGANIZE PWW HQ
-- to oversee PWW
-- to recruit BoD & volunteer staff
-- to recruit & guide Chapter organizers
-- to promote WWP to the public
2-BUILD CHAPTERS
-- to support WW Congressional candidates
-- to promote WWP to state & local governments
3-HOLD CONFERENCES
-- to get volunteers for PWW HQ & Chapters
-- to raise funds
-- to discuss ideas & network
-- to have fun
4-LOBBY federal & local governments
-- to promote WWP to governments
- Detailed Plan
==w3Feb
1-ORGANIZE PWW
1a. Get Fund-Raiser/Co-Manager
>-2. Plan FR/CM agreement
>-1. MW: Look for reply from MW
--2. Make FR/CM agreement
?-3. Ad for FR/CM ifnot MW
1b. Get Fiscal Sponsor maybe
>-1. D: Look for reply from D
>-2. Ask Quakers ---------- [d=daily, w=weekly]
1c. Get PWW Volunteers ----- d
--1. Conference Organizer -- w
--2. Speakers -------------- d
--3. Writers --------------- d
--4. Staff ----------------- d
--5. Webmaster
>y-- Plan enticements for volunteers:
evidence of best way to peace, email, hug, kiss, massage, date, meal, party, escort, fun, help, info, advice, gift,
biz startup: cafe, fun club, computer club
>y-- Define jobs
=0.. Founder
1-plan PWW
2-get Fund-Raiser/Co-Manager
3-get Fiscal Sponsor maybe
4-provide seed money
5-co-manage PWW
=1a. Fund-Raiser/Co-Manager
1-do fund-raising
2-co-manage PWW
=1b. Fiscal Sponsor
1-help find BoD
2-help plan
3-help do fund-raising
-1== Conference Organizer -- w
1-place nationwide ad each week
2-ask volunteers to help organize a conference in a large city
3-give volunteers advice how to organize it
4-ask for a report & video on the conference afterward
-2== Speakers -------------- d
1-speak to governmental bodies & the public about WWP
--3== Writers --------------- d
1-write for speakers, website, ads, email
-4== Staff ----------------- d
1-phone & email contacts
2-keep records
3-help BoD with decision making
-5== Webmaster
1-build website
2-make contact & donation feedback form
3-fix problems
-1== Chapter Organizers ---- w
1-look for volunteers
2-find meeting place
3-ask volunteers to meet
-2== Event Doers ----------- w
1-find place for events
2-plan events
3-oversee events
4-bank funds from events
-3== Reporters ------------- w
1-report chapter progress to HQ
-4== Volunteers ------------ d
1-attend meetings at events & assist staff
-5== Candidate Supporters -- w
1-find WW candidates
2-teach candidates & supporters WWP
-6== Entrepreneurs --------- d
1-get meeting place for events, meetings & business
2-get cook to make healthfood meals & treats
3-get computer equipment
4-plan educational, pro-PWW fun
5-invite young people to come
2-BUILD CHAPTERS
2a. Get Chapter Volunteers
==w4Feb
--1. Chapter Organizers ---- w
--2. Event Doers ----------- w
--3. Reporters ------------- w
--4. Volunteers ------------ d
--5. Candidate Support ----- w
--6. Entrepreneurs --------- d
3-HOLD CONFERENCES -------- w in different states
to get Volunteers, Candidates, Supporters & Funds
==w1Mar
4-LOBBY
4a. HQ Seek WWP Support from:
--1. U.S. Congressional candidates;
--2. Members of U.S. Congress;
--3. U.S. Administration;
4b. Chapters Seek WWP Support from:
--1. State candidates;
--2. State Legislature & Administration;
--3. City & County Boards;
4c. HQ Seek Adoption of WWP by:
--1. U.S. Congress;
--2. World governments;
4d. Chapters Seek Adoption of WWP by:
--1. U.S. States;
--2. U.S. Cities & Counties.
PLAN PWW
- Brief Plan: PWW: Project Win-Win
Goal: World governments adopt WWP: win-win process
1-ORGANIZE PWW HQ
2-BUILD CHAPTERS
3-HOLD CONFERENCES
4-LOBBY
- Detailed Plan:
==w3Feb
1-ORGANIZE PWW HQ
1a. Fund-Raiser/Co-Manager
--1. MW
--2. Make FR/CM agreement
?-3. Ad for FR/CM ifnot MW
1b. Fiscal Sponsor
--1. D
?-2. Ask Quakers ifnot D [d=daily, w=weekly]
1c. PWW Volunteers --------- d
--1. Conference Organizer -- w
--2. Speakers -------------- d
--3. Writers --------------- d
--4. Staff ----------------- d
--5. Webmaster
2-BUILD CHAPTERS
2a. Get Chapter Volunteers
==w4Feb
--1. Chapter Organizers ---- w
--2. Event Doers ----------- w
--3. Reporters ------------- w
--4. Volunteers ------------ d
--5. Candidate Support ----- w
3-HOLD CONFERENCES -------- w in different states
to get Volunteers, Candidates, Supporters & Funds
==w1Mar
4-LOBBY
4a. HQ Seek WWP Support from:
--1. U.S. Congressional candidates;
--2. Members of U.S. Congress;
--3. U.S. Administration;
4b. Chapters Seek WWP Support from:
--1. State candidates;
--2. State Legislature & Administration;
--3. City & County Boards;
4c. HQ Seek Adoption of WWP by:
--1. U.S. Congress;
--2. World governments;
4d. Chapters Seek Adoption of WWP by:
--1. U.S. States;
--2. U.S. Cities & Counties.
PWW Business Plan
February 14, 2009 by lloyd
PROJECT WIN-WIN, a.k.a. PWW
BUSINESS PLAN FOR YEARS 2009-2014
Lloyd Kinder
RR1, Box 50, Golden Eagle, IL 62036
LKINDR@yahoo.com
Feb. 14, 2009
CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION
2 OBJECTIVES re PWW SERVICES
3 MARKETING PLAN
4 PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATION PLAN
5 NEEDS
6 MY HISTORY (See http://gefs.lefora.com )
7 MY EXPERIENCE (See http://gefs.lefora.com )
8 PREVIOUS PLAN
(Front Cover: page 1)
---
1. INTRODUCTION
* The Purpose of this Business Plan
is to clarify and organize needed actions and assets and to interest people in Project Win-Win's efforts.
* The key aspect of this plan is how PWW would replace conventional win-lose process with win-win process, ultimately to end strife and achieve lasting world peace.
- DEFINITION OF WIN-WIN PROCESS
Win-Win process means determining the main concerns of all major groups, via group-sponsored scientifically conducted public surveys, and making only rules or legislation that satisfies all such concerns.
- VISION
* I envision Project Win-Win unifying the people, helping to elect win-win candidates and helping to legislate win-win process for all governmental decision making, thus bringing an end to strife, abuse and war.
* PWW will help peace groups and supporters and others communicate and coordinate actions in accordance with the Seven Best Ways to Lasting Peace, or an improved version of such ways, i.e. 1. HELP PEACE SUPPORTERS ORGANIZE BETTER; 2. UNIFY PROGRESSIVISM & LIBERTARIANISM; 3. SUPPORT PEACE CANDIDATES before and after elections; 4. TEACH PEACE CAREERS; 5. SUPPORT COMMUNITIES by investing in their young people; 6. BOYCOTT BIG BUSINESSES & COLLEGES; and 7. CONVERT YOUNGER CONSERVATIVES to peace supporters.
* PWW will support Golden Eagle Friends School and or similar free schools in providing knowledge and experience that will improve the quality of life of people in local communities and via the internet etc in communities throughout the world and these will greatly improve the health or quality of our society.
* The primary goal of Project Win-Win is world peace and maximum human progress for all, especially via the transformation of all governments into freedom supporting organizations. The latter would include empowered monitors and correctors of government abuses. The transformed organizations would also create knowledge institutes, which would preserve, advance, constantly update and prevent suppression of all important knowledge. Knowledge is currently suppressed by the ruling class's force-feeding of society its portrayal of reality via control of education and the major media.
- Grand View
* Society would surely be better off not focused on money, but on everyone learning healthy living in cooperation with each other.
* Instead of getting a job to make money to survive, we can work with others in community, while enjoying nature, and both survive and thrive.
* Instead of paying taxes that feed the war machine and its investors, we can do things for free and for donations, so we don't feed the machine, but we only feed our communities' peaceful prosperity.
* Instead of driving cars to work every workday, we can stay home in our communities most of the week and reduce pollution and waste.
* Instead of paying high prices for junk foods and its packaging by agribusiness, contributing to our ill health and unhappiness, we can grow most of our food and prepare it ourselves, increasing our health and happiness.
* Instead of paying insurance companies (which are part of the war machine) to "insure" our families' health, we can rely on our own health knowledge and that of friends and internet help.
* Instead of letting poorly trained teachers indoctrinate our kids in compulsory schools, we can educate them ourselves with help from experienced friends, professionals and the internet.
* Instead of letting doctors vaccinate our kids at school or in hospitals with toxic concoctions from the war machine's drug companies, we can support each other's right to choose our own healthcare methods.
* Instead of buying our kids junk, advertised in the war machine's major media, helping them become addicts of the system, we can give them fun and responsible experiences that help them learn to build a better alternative system.
* I'm eager for the human race to come of age, so that people will become highly responsible and find ways to end war, strife, greed, recklessness, apathy, misery etc in favor of world peace and prosperity, as well as peaceful exploration and colonization of other worlds.
- MY ROLE
* I plan to help organize Project Win-Win and help coordinate the teaching and establishing of win-win process in each state and later the world.
* Targeted clients will be all peace supporters, third parties, minorities and those who are oppressed or neglected.
- CURRENT PLAN - See http://pmec.lefora.com/2009/02/16/1548504-plan-pww/page1
- PREVIOUS PLAN - See Part 8 below
---
2. OBJECTIVES re PWW SERVICES
Progress will be measured by:
- the number of PWW branches in the U.S.
- the number of PWW branches in the world
- the number of city & county boards that adopt WW policy or law
- the number of states that adopt WW policy or law
- the number of Congressional candidates who support WW
- Congress adopting WW policy or law
Objectives for PWW are:
(F9 = Feb 09, L9 = July 09)
....US Chapters; World Ch; CCBoards; States.; ConCands;
.L9 _____ 20 ______ 40 _______ 5+ _____ 0 ______ 10
.J10 _____ 60 _____ 100 ______ 30+ _____ 1 ______ 40
.J11 ____ 200 _____ 600 _____ 300+ _____ 5 _____ 200
.J12 ____ 350 ____ 2000 ____ 1500+ ____ 20 _____ 350
.J13 ____ 435 ___ 10000 ____ 5000+ ____ 50 _____ 435
-2- Objectives re Marketing & Finance:
.M9 WEBSITE: to develop a professional website with user-friendly registration forms for helpers, with persuasive offers and effective donation forms;
.A9 TELEMARKETING: to have people doing recruiting & fund-raising by phone;
.A9 EVENTS: to hold weekly chapter events of Christmas-like gift-giving every weekend to attract potential helpers;
-4- Objectives re Organization & People:
.J9 to organize PWW helpers sociocratically as a cooperative, wherein all participants and supporters share ownership of the project;
-5- Objectives re Equipment & Location:
.A9 to obtain supplies & services via event donations and via purchases with donated funds;
.L9 to have PWW branches in each U.S. Congressional District first, then the world.
---
3. MARKETING PLAN
- Target clients will be:
. public officials and candidates;
- Market Research Results
. (Do market research to find what types of people and what percent of the public and public officials will be likely supporters of PWW; ask potential clients what they want when and where and report findings here.)
- The Distribution Channel/s of PWW Services will be:
. PWW chapters, websites, other forums, emails and weekend gift-giving event flyers and speeches;
- Means of Getting Candidate Clients will be the same (advertised as PRs and CL ads and emails);
. CL ads and local emails;
. (Include examples of our graphic identity, press cuttings.)
- PWW's Competitors are:
. some members of the ruling class;
- PWW's Major Advantages are that:
. our win-win process should appeal to everyone, because it makes everyone winners all of the time;
. we have a clear, detailed, workable plan to reach our goal;
. we are organized egalitarianly, with efficient, sociocratic unanimous rule;
. we're independent from the government, whereas 501c3 nonprofits are restricted in their promotion of peace activism;
. we're agile enough to respond quickly or effectively to changing events in our environment;
- PWW's Suppliers are: ?
---
4. PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATION PLAN
. PWW is organized as a church, which does not need to be under IRS supervision, according to IRS law, as stated at CFR Title 26, Section 501c3. The helpers are therefore ministers, which means they serve the people.
. The Board of Directors includes:
-- paid and volunteer partners;
-- representatives of subgroups;
The subgroups will include:
--- helpers;
--- staff;
--- donors;
--- and other local community members;
-- Each subgroup will have 2 representatives each, one chosen by the BoD, the other by the subgroup;
--- The BoD will meet once a month;
--- Subgroups will meet monthly but autonomously;
--- Decisions will be made by consensus;
- Job Titles include:
Board Members; Helpers; Staff; and Subgroup Reps;
- Duties:
-- The Board manages PWW and facilitates relationships;
-- Helpers mediate communications between PWW, local chapters and supporters according to the Board's guidelines;
-- The staff assists Board Members with secretarial functions and volunteer work;
-- Subgroup Reps represent subgroups' concerns at Board Meetings;
- Board Members are:
. Lloyd Kinder (Founder):
-- Second-ranked student in 1967 graduating class from Brussels Community High School, Brussels, IL;
-- Escapee on excuse of undifferentiated schizophrenia relating to grandiosity, or "delusions of grandeur", August 1970, from U.S. Air Force (On a multiple choice questionnaire for psychiatric evaluation I said I'm God and that people are stupid, and no explanation was requested; if it had been I might have explained that I'm part of God's omniscience, like everyone else, and we're all stupid, compared to God, which is evident anyway from the fact that we live in a war culture);
-- Honor Student, B.S. in Nutrition, 1983 from American College of Health Science, Springfield area of MO;
-- Honor Student, A.S. in Math, 1990 from Lewis and Clark Community College, Godfrey, IL;
-- Honor Student, Dean's List, 1996 from SIUE, Edwardsville, IL.
---
5. PWW NEEDS
WW political candidates
Funds (to be determined)
BoD Members
Event coordinators
Chapter founders
Converts to PWW
---
6. MY HISTORY
- I'm 60 y.o. I've been idealistic and altruistic since high school graduation in 1967;
- 1955-1967 worked hard at farmwork for 12 years until then and learned to appreciate work well done, as well as finding creative solutions to problems in a wide range of work types;
- 1967-70 went to college for 2 years, then the Air Force for one year; college seemed too bureaucratic with too much irrelevant red tape; the Air Force felt like prison and depressed me; when I learned about environmentalism in early 1970, I became interested in that; after deciding to try to get out of the military, I met a fellow airman in Thailand who'd returned from going AWOL and he told me the U.S. had no right to be in Vietnam; I then went and read the history of Vietnam in an Air Force library and saw that he was apparently right, so I became an objector to the Vietnam War mostly in private, but was soon able to leave the Air Force with an "honorable" discharge;
- 1970-75 worked on the family farm and the newly acquired family restaurant for 5 years;
- 1976-81 moved to S. MO, S. IL, WV & OH to work at organic growing, alternative tech, relationships, co-operation etc;
- 1982-84 lived at the family farm and got a nutrition degree by correspondence and failed at trying to start a nutrition clinic in Alton, IL;
- 1984-89 attended frequent Overeaters Anonymous & Al-Anon meetings around Edwardsville, IL, Austin, TX, Denver, CO and Tallahassee, FL;
- 1990-96 took college classes toward a degree in Elementary Education at Godfrey and Edwardsville, IL;
- 1996-2001 worked on the family farm with my brother, growing conventional crops organically, but not profitably;
- 2001-4 ran for IL state senate, then supported progressivism and Kucinich for president in the Boston area;
- 2003-7 wrote 5 books: Codaplus, Ending the Abuse of Power, The Miracle of Peace, Best Discipline, and The Bible Is Libertarian;
- 2008 began to organize Golden Eagle Friends School, while doing landscaping work and labor at the family restaurant. This led to organizing the Peace Movement Empowerment Circle, which in turn soon led to organizing Project Win-Win as apparently the best means to resolve conflicts and achieve world peace, justice and prosperity.
---
7. MY EXPERIENCE RE PEACE ACTIVISM
For most of my life I've been involved in occupations that support the Peace Culture, including: Organic Growing; Natural Health; Pacifist Intentional Community; and Learning Healthy Relationships, Non-authoritarianism, Parent Effectiveness Training, Reflective Listening, Consensus Decision Making, Non-authoritarian Home Schooling, Teaching Babies from IAHP.org, 12 Step Recovery programs, Arts, Crafts, Alternative Technology, Progressive Ministry, Cooperative Business, and Peace Activism.
My Peace Activism has been as follows:
1973 onward: learned & supported non-authoritarianism etc;
2000: learned the law on taxes;
2000 onward: learned & supported the progressive American System of political economics;
2001-2002: ran for IL state Senate to learn how it's done;
2003: learned traffic law & civil rights law;
2002 onward: practiced anti-war activism, supported Kucinich for president, wrote anti-war books & articles, started an anti-war internet forum.
==========================================
8. PREVIOUS PLAN
Follow the Seven Best Ways to Bring Lasting World Peace
Short Rationale Version
1. HELP PEACE SUPPORTERS ORGANIZE BETTER by forming a Peace Intergroup
==because the peace culture is much less organized than the war culture==
2. UNIFY PROGRESSIVISM & LIBERTARIANISM
==because these are the main Peace groups & they're not unified enough==
3. SUPPORT WIN-WIN CANDIDATES
==because laws need to be improved to promote Peace & Freedom==
4. TEACH PEACE CAREERS
==because conventional careers support the war culture==
5. SUPPORT COMMUNITIES by investing in their young people
==because otherwise they begin careers in the war culture==
6. BOYCOTT BIG BUSINESSES & COLLEGES
==because they're the main supporters of the war culture==
7. CONVERT YOUNGER CONSERVATIVES
==because conservatives are the main voters for the war culture==
- Planning Version of Previous Plan
1. INTERGROUP:
Form a Peace Intergroup
a1. (FIND) define & identify peace groups & compatible people;
- Peace groups support nonviolence and boycott violence in society;
- Compatible people do not support violence in society;
a2. (UFPJ) check out UFPJ groups & organization;
a3. (INVITE) Invite Peace supporters to form a Peace Intergroup;
a3. (NAME) ask what's the best name for a Peace Intergroup;
- Peace Movement Empowerment Circle
- Peace & Freedom Empowerment Circle
- Peace & Freedom Intergroup
- PFMEC: Peace & Freedom Movement Empowerment Circle
a4. (PITCHES) write persuasive pitches for callers & emailers to use;
a5. (INVITE) ask supporters to call or email to invite new members;
b. (ORGANIZE) do non-authoritarian/egalitarian self-organizing;
c1. (ONLINE) interact mostly online;
c2. (DESIGN) improve website design for easy interaction;
d1. (CONTACTS) ask each group to provide a PI contact;
d2. (CONNECT) ask members to join Peace groups to relay messages;
e. (PLAN) set goals and follow plans to achieve them;
f. (SCHOOL) support peace school;
g. (EVENTS) ask local Peace people to hold weekly PI events;
==so Peace supporters can interact, promote, fund-raise etc==
h1. (WEBSITES) design websites to maximize effective PI interaction;
h2. (HOW) ask what sites show how best to interact online;
2. PHILOSOPHY: Unify & promote Progressivism-Libertarianism;
a. (POWWOW) invite Prgs & Lbts to settle differences & join PI;
3. POLITICS: Find & support Peace-committed candidates & elected officials;
a. (RECRUIT) recruit peace candidates;
b. (FIND) identify peace-committed public officials;
c. (CAMPAIGN) support peace candidates' campaigns;
d. (LAW) help peace-committed public officials fix laws;
4. PEACE CAREERS: Support free peace school;
a. (SELECT) identify peace & non-peace careers;
a1- Peace careers are:
-- 1. Philosophy & Activism;
-- 2. Cuop Business
-- 3. Natural Diet & Healthcare;
-- 4. Permaculture & Organic Growing;
-- 5. Alternative Technology;
-- 6. Arts & Crafts;
-- 7. Alternative Finance; etc.
a2- Non-peace careers include:
-- 1. Authoritarian Philosophy & Activism;
-- 2. all Big Businesses whose owners support Authoritarianism, Violence orWar, including (1) Big Banks & Law Firms, (2) Major Media, (3) War Industry, (4) Prison Industry, (5) Drug Companies, (6) Agribusiness, (7) Big Food Companies, (8) Major Manufacturers etc;
-- 3. Governments that support pre-emptive war, inhumane imprisonment, or other authoritarianism;
-- 4. Schools that support compulsory education, the war industry, or other authoritarianism;
b. (CULTURE) teach peace cuops & peace careers;
c. (PHILOSOPHY) teach Prg-Lbt Philosophy + History;
d. (POLITICS) teach students to be candidates & campaign supporters;
e. (TEACHING) teach students to teach peace careers;
f. (INVESTING) teach students local investing & boycotting;
g. (PREACHING) teach students to help convert younger conservatives;
5. COMMUNITY: Invest in local young people;
a. (EDUCATION) teach independent thinking & peace careers;
b. (BUSINESS) help support cuop businesses;
6. INVEST: Promote peace culture & boycott war culture;
a. (INVEST) promote local investing & alternative finance;
b. (PRO-GEFS) promote alternative education & careers;
c. (BOYCOTT) boycott big businesses & colleges;
7. CONVERT: Promote Peace to younger conservative Christians;
a. (VIDEOS) make online videos;
b. (FORUMS) write to forums, blogs ...;
c. (ANSWER) answer neocon commentators;
d. (PAPERS) write Letters to Editors.
2. PREVIOUS OBJECTIVES re PMEC SERVICES
Progress will be measured by:
#1. PMEC Branches to HELP PEACE SUPPORTERS ORGANIZE BETTER;
#2. Branches that UNIFY PROGRESSIVISM & LIBERTARIANISM;
#3. PEACE CANDIDATES: Incumbants & New Candidates;
#4. Students learning PEACE CAREERS;
#5. Cuop Businesses to SUPPORT COMMUNITIES;
#6. Investment Clubs to BOYCOTT BIG BUSINESSES & COLLEGES;
#7. YOUNGER CONSERVATIVE Converts;
Objectives for each "Way to Peace" are:
(.N8 = November 2008, J9 = January 2009, L9 = July 2009)
.D8 I promote PMEC and teach Progressive Philosophy & Peace Activism;
- Plan: #6 #1 ......#2 ........#3 .......#4 ....#5 ...#7
Club/Branches; Unities; Campaigns; Students; Cuops; Converts
.J9 ....... 5 ..... 2 .. 30+... 1 ...... 10 .... 1 .. 0%
.L9 ...... 50 .... 10 .. 30+. 100 ..... 100 ... 15 .. 0%
.J10 .... 500 .... 50 .. 30+ 1000 ..... 300 ... 50 .. 1%
.J11 ... 5000 ... 300 . 200+ 5000 .... 1000 .. 200 .. 5%
.J12 .. 50000 .. 2000 . 200+20000 .... 5000 .. 500 . 10%
.J13 . 500000 . 10000 . 500+50000 ... 25000 . 2000 . 30%
#4 GEFS Objectives Details:
.J9 New teachers teach the same, plus Cuop Business, Permaculture & Organic Growing, Alternative Technology, Arts & Crafts;
Date; Students; Teachers; Branches; Events/Wk; Donations/Wk (= Expenses);
.J9 ....... 10 ....... 2 ....... 2 ........ 2 ........ 500
.L9 ...... 100 ....... 5 ....... 4 ........ 7 ...... 2,100
.J10 ..... 300 ...... 15 ...... 20 ....... 30 ...... 9,000
.J11 ... 1,000 ...... 40 ..... 100 ...... 150 ..... 45,000
.J12 ... 5,000 ..... 100 ..... 700 .... 1,000 .... 300,000
.J13 .. 25,000 ..... 300 ... 2,000 .... 7,000 .. 2,100,000
-2- Objectives re Marketing:
.D8 to develop a professional website with user-friendly registration forms for helpers, with persuasive offers and effective donation forms;
.D8 and to hold weekly events of Christmas-like gift-giving every weekend to attract potential helpers;
-3- Objectives re Finance: to receive donations for supplies:
.D8 via weekly gift-giving events;
.D8 and via persuasive, user-friendly website forms;
-4- Objectives re Organization & People:
.J9 to organize PMEC helpers sociocratically as a cooperative, wherein all participants and supporters share ownership of the school;
-5- Objectives re Equipment & Location:
.J9 to obtain supplies & services via event donations and via purchases with donated funds;
.J9 to have PMEC branches throughtout the U.S. first, then the world.
4. Origins of War
December 30, 2008 by lloyd
PMEC Objectives
December 27, 2008 by lloyd
* PMEC Objectives are: to have these many Consultants, Clubs, Candidates & Electees in the next 5 years:
Yr. __ Consultants __ Clubs _ Candidates _ Electees
09:Q1 ______ 20 ______ 5 _______ 10
09:Q2 _____ +50 _____ +8 ______ +20
09:Q3 ____ +150 ____ +15 ______ +30
09:Q4 ____ +400 ____ +25 ______ +40
10: ____ +2,000 ___ +150 _____ =100 _____ 40
11: ____ +4,000 ___ +400 ______ 600
12: ____ +7,000 _ +1,000 _____ =600 ____ 300
13: ___ +12,000 _ +2,000
DISTRICTS
These are the pro-war Congressional Districts and their main cities, where PMEC proposes that peace candidates may most easily be elected:
AL02 Montgomery - CA44 San Clemente - AL05 Huntsville - MN06 St Cloud - FL25 Homestead - PA06 Downingtown - SC01 Georgetown - WA08 Bellevue - AK01 Anchorage - CA50 Escondido - CA03 Elk Grove - TX17 Waco - AL03 Auburn - MI11 Livonia - IL10 Waukegan - AZ05 Scottsdale - WY01 Cheyenne - CA45 Palm Springs - OH02 Portsmouth - SC02 Hilton Head - CA46 Costa Mesa - AZ03 Paradise Valley - CA26 Glendale - CA02 Redding - IL13 Tinsdale - TX23 Pecos - NV02 Carson City - TX32 Inwood - TX27 Corpus Christi - FL21 Hialea - PA10 Williamston - TX10 Katy - AZ08 Tuscon - FL18 Miami - CA25 Victorville - IL06 Wheaton - PA04 Beaver Falls - TX07 West University Place - GA08 Macon
Clubs
December 27, 2008 by lloyd
STARTING A WIN-WIN CLUB
* Microloans up to $500 may be available for Win-Win Clubs.
* To start a Win-Win Club, or to get a loan to start one, do as follows:
- Recruit a Board of 3 Directors for the Club;
- Have a large dining area available, esp. on weekends;
- Get $500 worth of health food supplies, mostly local when possible:
-- eggs, meat, produce, honey, kefir, butter, sardines, vinegar etc;
- Get cooks and pay them from donations for meals;
- Invite people privately, not publicly, to the Club; have a small sign saying Win-Win Club; have a private, not public, entrance with a door bell.
- Ask local peace supporters to pay donations to join the Club;
- And ask them to help hold weekly SOX events [See http://pmec.lefora.com/2008/12/01/fun-events/page1 ] & to invite people from all political viewpoints to attend;
- Ask local people to teach classes at SOX events on Peace Activism, Alternative Health, CoBusiness & Ecology;
- Ask Alternative Health teacher/s to advise the cooks on what health foods to stock & what dishes to cook & to organize a natural food buying club & CSA, or Community Supported Agriculture group;
- Have weekly peace campaign committee planning meetings;
- Ask CoBusiness teacher/s to have meetings on local investing & boycotting big business & conventional colleges;
- Get computers with internet access, but avoid wireless & routers, if possible, or put up metal screening to protect from microwaves;
- Ask teacher/s to get educational games for club members;
- Ask members to plan concerts to attract local young people;
- The club is a "church", so request minimum donations for all goods & services provided & announce that tips are counted as additional donations; keep no official records, but unofficial ones; give the donations to the BoD for church/club use.
- Pay back the loan within 6 months with no interest charge.
Candidates
December 27, 2008 by lloyd
RECRUIT & ELECT WIN-WIN PEACE CANDIDATES
* Win-Win is a method that makes every candidate who uses it a peace candidate. That's because such a candidate seeks to find solutions that satisfy every group's main concerns.
* Ask local peace supporters to be peace candidates. Tell them what the benefits would be. If elected, the benefits would be a salary plus opportunity to promote win-win legislation.
* Ask local peace supporters and groups to help find people to be peace candidates. Tell them about win-win dialog and PMEC goals for building a peace culture that brings relative world peace by 2013 or asap.
* Ask potential candidates to work together as a team to help each other become better candidates. Teach them win-win dialog.
* Teach them not to express or promote views that divide people, but always to seek solutions that help unite people. Explain to them what views divide people and what solutions unite people.
* Win-Win Dialog is simply listening to the concerns of everyone present, restating their concerns until they acknowledge that you seem to understand, then asking everyone to try to think of solutions that satisfy everyone's concerns. I've attempted to do that at pmec.lefora.com/...
* When a peace candidate speaks to a group, heshe can read from a list of general concerns and ask the audience to signal for each concern that members share.
* The candidate then can ask audience members to come to the mike briefly to propose solutions that satisfy everyone's concerns.
* The candidate or a helper can write down proposed solutions on a blackboard & ask which solution is best.
* The candidate should speak first before small, friendly audiences, before speaking to general audiences. Use the Win-Win Club to gather friendly audiences.
* After having experience with friendly audiences, start inviting people from various groups to come to the Club to hear the candidate and express their concerns. Only invite members of one group at a time. Groups to consider inviting are: business people, workers, parents, elderly, churches, greens, & political groups.
* One goal of the campaign should be to rely largely on word of mouth, rather than expensive advertising, to achieve popularity.
* What do you do if a pro-war person wants to be a candidate? I think you should ask the person if heshe's willing to seek win-win solutions. If the answer is yes, then consider working with the person as long as heshe truly does seek such solutions.
* It seems that subliminal suggestion is fairly effective for getting people to take agreeable actions. The campaign could consider making signs etc that have the message of PEACE, LOVE, UNITY, FREEDOM etc somewhat hidden along with the candidate's name not hidden.
* Everyone needs to learn Responsibility, in order to have the maximum possible peace and freedom in the world. Something that helps people learn responsibility is doing personal moral inventory privately & making amends asap to anyone that the person has wronged & doing so in the most appropriate ways, which friends & others can often help explain. See ncbs.lefora.com
Re: New Laws
December 19, 2008 by lloyd
REPLY TO CINDY SHEEHAN
* I just replied to Cindy Sheehan's appeal for donations and other help to keep her campaign office open. Here's my reply.
* It looks like you need 48,000 votes or more to get elected [in 2010], assuming a popular Republican doesn't help you by cutting into Pelosi's vote. So you don't really need any money at all. You need a few thousand volunteers to help persuade 48,000 voters to vote for you.
* If you want to build a culture of world peace and freedom, not just win an election, you should use win-win dialog with voters. You ask them what their main political concerns are. You tell them what you think they said are their concerns. When they acknowledge that you understand their concerns, you briefly mention your main concerns, then ask them if they can think of potential solutions that may satisfy both sides' concerns. If they think of something, write it down. If you think of something, tell them your idea and see what they think.
* You can ask your volunteers to do that too. If you have 5,000 volunteers starting in early 2010 or a little earlier, each one needs to persuade about 10 Pelosi voters to vote for you. They'll each have 10 months to persuade 10 people. If you get 10,000 volunteers, they'll need only persuade 5 voters each in 10 months.
* Your volunteers should ask for the email IDs and or phone #s of Pelosi voters, so you can remind them once a month what your proposals are. You should also encourage them to mention any main concerns they may not have thought of previously. Anyway, the reminders may be needed so people who were persuaded to vote for you earlier don't forget by election time. This may be elementary, but I may have to tell other new candidates the same thing in coming months.
* I've started working on legislation proposals that I think may satisfy many voters' concerns at
http://pmec.lefora.com/2008/12/16/unify/page1. I think peace candidates should support something like those proposals; and their supporters should help improve the proposals. Working on such win-win types of legislation proposals should help build the culture of peace that we long for. Yes, no?
Re: New Laws
December 19, 2008 by lloyd
OBSTACLES TO PEACE
What are the main obstacles to world peace?
1. Obstacle #1 seems to be the ruling class, which manipulates and divides people against each other to increase its own power and reduce the numbers of the lower classes. They apparently give secret donations to extremists and help them disseminate their divisive propaganda. They help arm opposing extremist groups and secretly encourage them to fight against each other.
2. Obstacle #2 seems to be hateful religions, which promote domination of people and restrictions on freedom of thought and expression and sometimes racism and genocide.
3. Obstacle #3 seems to be governments, which seek to establish or secure a ruling class to dominate the lower classes.
What are likely to be the best ways to overcome these obstacles?
1. Have win-win dialog with the ruling class, religious leaders & government leaders, or with their major supporters.
2. Expose their machinations.
3. Use true propaganda to divide them against each other.
4. Pray thanking God for dividing members of the ruling class and their major supporters against each other, so that they lose their power over the lower classes. Pray also thanking God for revealing love to them and to all asap.
D14o8 PLAN
December 16, 2008 by lloyd
DIVIDE INTO 4 GROUPS
It seems that PMEC should divide into 4 groups:
1. promoting win-win dialog on forums and at local special events;
G f1: find 20 progressives, 20 libertarians, 20 minorities to promote win-win dialog;
G f win-win dialog: increase the number of peace supporters in every area;
2. helping peace groups recruit & support peace candidates;
3. teaching peace careers;
4. promoting local investing.
GP PLAN FOR GROWTH
1. Get new volunteers.
2a. Discuss with volunteers giving local peace groups PMEC leaflets,
which explain how PMEC wants to help groups.
2b. Discuss also organizing local peace events.
2c. Ask area contacts to file progress reports to google form.
3. Email progress reports to volunteers and fans.
4. Answer volunteers' emails.
5. Get more volunteers to help on my job and others.
Goal: get PMEC contacts in every major U.S. city
1st: y.NYC, y.Chicago, y.DC, n.LA, y.Boston
2nd: Miami, Seattle, St. Paul, Dallas, Detroit
3rd: Phoenix, Denver, Atlanta, Cleveland, Philly
4th: Frisco, Portland, St. Louis, New Orleans, KC
STRATEGIC PLAN
* Our goal is permanent world peace & freedom. It seems that to do this we must build a culture of peace to replace the culture of war and greed.
* I think the key to success is organizing, so we must organize better than the war culture, as via strategic planning, win-win dialog and unanimous rule in small groups.
* Here is a strategic plan.
1* First, let's unify our diverse peace supporters.
- We can start on internet forums, asking Progressives, Libertarians, Minorities et al to settle our differences.
- Then we can help our united friends spread the word locally via exciting events, like SOX.
2* We need to recruit and support peace candidates mainly by win-win dialog.
3* We need to have lots of free school teachers teaching peace careers, instead of conventional careers that support the war culture. GEFS is starting to do this. See gefs.lefora.com
4* We should organize investment clubs to promote:
a. doing the great majority of our business with locally-owned businesses
b. helping young people start co-operative local businesses
c. doing minimal business with big businesses and conventional colleges, which support the war culture.
5* We can use win-win dialog on forums and at local SOX events to convert younger Conservatives to peace, because Conservatives are the main voters for war.
New Laws
December 16, 2008 by lloyd
MESSAGE SENT TO SEVERAL PEACE YAHOOGROUPS (moments ago)
(See more detailed version following the simple version here.)
I think the peace movement would be greatly empowered if diverse peace supporters would seek unity by understanding each others' concerns. So below I state what seem to be some of the main concerns of various groups. And after that I propose what laws we should perhaps ask peace candidates to agree to promote, once elected by our support, which laws may be agreeable to all peace supporters. I welcome comments to LKINDR@yahoo.com yahoo.com.
Differences between Progressives, Libertarians et al
* A major difference between Progressives and Libertarians is that Progressives regard the governments within the U.S. as organizations properly intended to be of the people, by the people and for the people, whereas Libertarians regard these governments as usurpers of the people's power and abusers of the people's freedoms.
* A concern of Progressives is that reducing government power, as Libertarians favor, would leave the powerless defenseless against organized abusers.
* A concern of Libertarians is that governments tend to be the worst abusers.
* What potential solutions would satisfy both parties' concerns?
* Most Libertarians might be satisfied if there were ways to prevent governments' abuses and infringements on freedoms.
* Most Progressives might be satisfied if there were some way to protect the most powerless from organized abusers.
* So how can we organize so as to defend the most powerless and prevent defenders from becoming abusers of power?
1. We can unite to recruit & elect peace candidates who share Progressives', Libertarians', Minorities' et al concerns.
2. We can recruit, if we prefer, only candidates who agree with and agree to follow our plan.
3. A plan for our candidate lawmakers could be as follows.
(See more detailed plan at pmec.lefora.com/...)
3:1. Re UNJUST WAR: __favored by all Peace Supporters__
Forbid pre-emptive and unjust war by requiring a fair and speedy trial to governments accused of threatening our national security.
3:2. Re UNJUST LAWS: __favored by all__
Forbid unconstitutional lawmaking and repeal all unconstitutional laws, including esp. FISA, the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act and the Federal Reserve Act.
3:3. Re SECRECY: __favored by Progressives & Libertarians__
Require that all government covert operations and the funds used for them be disclosed to each state government and each state grand jury.
3:4. Re TAXES: __favored by Libertarians__
Outlaw all taxation, but allow voluntary fees for gov't services etc.
3:5. Re POSSESSION: __favored by Libertarians, Minorities & Progressives__
Forbid the outlawing of possessions, but require restrictions on use of dangerous possessions solely to insure public safety. Release from prison all who were charged solely with violating laws found to be unjust, such as possession laws.
3:6. Re POLLUTION: __favored by Environmentalists & Progressives__
Require finding and fining anyone who produces anything that significantly endangers public safety and the biosphere.
3:7. Re TRADE: __favored by Progressives__
Require finding and fining or deporting anyone who trades significantly with anyone in an imperialist nation, which endangers our national security.
3:8. Re TRAVEL: __favored by Libertarians__
Forbid mandating of driver's licenses and insurance, except on those who use public roads to transport people or freight for fees. Forbid outlawing foreigners from traveling in the U.S., except those known to be threats to national security.
3:9. Re RIGHTS: __favored by Progressives & Libertarians__
Require acknowledgement of all human rights for everyone in the U.S., regardless of citizenship.
3:10. Re POVERTY: __favored by Progressives & Minorities__
Require acknowledgement of everyone's right to equal access to land to grow enough food etc for survival, or to just compensation from those using excess land.
3:11. Re NATIONAL SECURITY: __favored by Conservatives__
Require finding security threats everywhere in the world, especially among governments & organized groups, and require licensed media to make them known to the public and require requesting each of the accused to attend a fair, convenient & speedy public trial to clear them of the accusation of being threats.
The Plan for our Lawmakers in greater detail: Let's ask them to Make these laws:
3:1. Re UNJUST WAR: Outlaw pre-emptive and unjust war by requiring that, in order to declare war for more than one month, the government must provide a fair and speedy trial to the opposing government, accused of being a threat to our national security. Require making treaties that forbid all governments and their residents from making and using dangerous weapons.
3:2a. Re UNJUST LAWS: Forbid lawmakers to pass laws that violate the Constitution. Require all bills be approved by grand juries in all 50 states before making them laws. At the same time, require that grand juries be fully informed of their rights as juries, similar to Miranda requirements on police re arrestees. Require that methods of selecting grand jury members be constitutional.
3:2b. Require that all previous statutes also be reviewed by grand juries to determine constitutionality and those found unconstitutional to be repealed. (This would guarantee that FISA, the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act, the Federal Reserve Act etc will be repealed.)
3:3a. Re SECRECY: Require that all government covert operations be fully disclosed to all branches of each state government and a grand jury in each state and every expenditure by the government be audited.
3:3b. Also forbid awarding government contracts to anyone without fair bidding.
3:4. Re TAXES: Forbid the government from imposing taxes on anyone, but require fees to be charged for services rendered to recipients who voluntarily request such services. Forbid mandating of driver's licenses and insurance, except on those who use public roads to transport people or freight for fees. Forbid outlawing foreigners from traveling in the U.S., except those known to be threats to national security. Acknowledge every adult's right to own a vehicle and to drive it on public roadways, with no restrictions, but those scientifically proven to be effective, solely for public safety. Acknowledge that, because everyone has the right to live and life requires land on which to grow food, everyone in the U.S. will be allowed access to 7 acres of land for survival. Anyone using more than 7 acres for oneself will be charged a fair rental fee, to be dispersed equally among the public.
3:5. Re POSSESSION: Forbid the government from outlawing possession of any object or substance, but require government to put restrictions on such possession, solely to insure public safety. Require that all people imprisoned for violating unjust laws be released asap. Require that Grand Juries be assembled to review all prison procedures to guarantee that prisoners are not abused by staff or other prisoners and that scientifically proven methods of reform are strongly promoted to prisoners.
3:6-11. Use Grand Juries to determine proper fines and restrictions to be imposed.
Conservatives' vs. Liberals' Concerns
* A concern of Conservatives is that Liberals' desire for peace, by opposing pre-emptive war and reducing defense spending, jeopardizes our national defense, so that terrorists and illegal immigrants will increasingly threaten our security and freedom.
* A concern of Liberals is that Neocons over-emphasize security and exaggerate or lie about threats from terrorism as a smokescreen to hide their true motives of greed and lust for power and that the laws and policies they promote, including pre-emptive war, are the greatest threats to our freedom and security. Some even suspect that our own or our allies' covert operations are the real organizers or facilitators of some terrorism.
Re: Win-Win
December 10, 2008 by lloyd
TO CHANDANA IN WAR-TORN SRI LANKA
* I think what's basically needed to achieve peace in any area is friendly dialog in a semi-public setting. The first step I think is to settle differences among peace supporters, using Hear to Win-Win Dialog, which is similar to NVC. The next step is to settle differences between peace supporters and those who are neutral, not certain whether peace or war is best. Next is to settle differences with friendlier opponents who support war. And last is to settle with those who are unfriendly, using the assistance of those who are friendlier opponents of peace.
* Hear to Win-Win means that peace supporters host meetings with others. Then they need to Hear what others' concerns are and show others they understand. Once the hosts show understanding, they should ask the guests and others to try to think of solutions to problems that satisfy everyone's concerns. If guests don't know peace supporters' concerns, hosts can tell them, before thinking of solutions. When solutions are found, hosts can ask guests to join with the hosts to support implementing the solution/s.
* Win-win means solutions are chosen by which both parties will win, or be satisfied, i.e. hosts and guests.
Win-Win
December 9, 2008 by lloyd
Hear to Win-Win
1. Ask people to come settle differences for world peace & freedom
2. Ask what everyone's main concerns are
3. Ask volunteers to take the stand & express their main concerns
4. Mediator, state your understanding of the person's concern and ask if you have it correct
5. When you have it correct, ask for solutions that would satisfy everyone's concerns
6. Ask if everyone will join in promoting similar dialog and solutions
GP1 Sensitivity & Peace Cats vs. War Dogs
* Conservatives worry that liberals' desires for peace are weakening our national defenses, so that terrorists and illegal immigrants will increasingly threaten our security and freedom. Liberals worry that Neocons over-emphasize security and exaggerate or lie about threats from terrorism as a smokescreen to hide their true motives of greed and lust for power and that the laws and policies they promote, including pre-emptive war, are the greatest threats to our freedom and security. Some even suspect that our own or our allies' covert operations are the real organizers or facilitators of some terrorism.
* People with opposing concerns can come to agreements for the good of all. It requires only that some of them begin to show and encourage sensitivity to the others' concerns and ask everyone to try to think of solutions that satisfy everyone's concerns asfarap.
* The best way to show sensitivity is probably to state what the other party's feeling seems to be and what the feeling is about. I like to make my sensitivity statements in the form of questions. So here's an example of showing sensitivity to Conservatives' concerns: Are you worried that liberals' desires for peace are weakening our national defenses, so that terrorists and illegal immigrants will increasingly threaten our security and freedom? If they are satisfied that you understand, then you should ask them to think of solutions that will satisfy both sides' concerns. If they can't think of any, you can mention your proposal for a solution and ask what they think of it. If they like your idea, then you can ask them if they will support it with you.
* I think it's feasible for sensitivity to become effective enough to end wars and terrorism within 5 years.
* So now I'm wondering what may be the most effective route by which to use sensitivity to end war and terrorism and maybe other major governmental abuses.
D7o8Plan
December 9, 2008 by lloyd
Determine & follow the Best Ways to Peace
1. Organize, i.e. communicate and co-operate, better than the war culture.
* Write & send new email for help to YG' GG' FSP (See previous messages)
* Ask members in each location to start a team, or branch & send Lf1
* Ask for communication helpers [That's not clear]
* Write persuasive pitches for callers & emailers to use
* Ask callers & emailers to invite supporters to join
* Email weekly Lessons to YGs to share knowledge & seek help [Peace MECca]
* Send members regular progress reports [GP PR]
* Ask What's the best name for a Peace Intergroup?
- Peace Movement Empowerment Circle
- Peace & Freedom Empowerment Circle
- Peace & Freedom Intergroup
* Ask teams to report on PMEC form every ten days
* Write message to peace groups on How PMEC Will Help Peace Movement
* Ask groups for contact persons to relay messages
* Ask members to join local groups to be their contact persons
* Ask groups to try egalitarian unanimous rule
* Ask groups to do the 7 Best Ways to Peace
* Ask teams to have weekly events for private & public interaction, teaching peace careers, peace promotion & possibly fund-raising
* Find event ideas under CL events to make our circle action-filled
* Design websites to maximize effective interaction
* Ask what sites show how best to interact online, what sites to imitate
* Publish submissions on how best to use the internet
2. Plan to unify Progressives, Libertarians, Minorities &c for peace
* Prepare & teach Progressive-Libertarian Philosophy & History
* Plan, develop & promote Hear-Win-Win Dialog:
.1. Accurately state opponent's concern, till opponent feels understood
.2. Ask opponent to reciprocate, till home team feels understood
.3. Both help think of a mutually beneficial solution
.4. Both join in supporting the solution
.5. PMEC publish solution/s
* Write & email to groups:
* How to unify diverse peace supporters with Hear-Win-Win Dialog
* Invite Prgs, Lbts, Mins, Grns, Socs & other peace supporters to dialog
* See pdamerica.org/policy/priorities.php & freestateproject.org
* Follow Hear-Win-Win procedure
* Send dialog transcript to PMEC
* PMEC publish the dialog solutions
3. Organize to find good peace candidates & elected officials
* List our candidates & officials & ask to support them
* Recruit volunteers & they help officials improve the law
* Teach students to be candidates & campaign supporters & law experts
4. Help free schools teach & support peace careers & peace cuops
* Develop & promote material that explains what are peace careers
* Write introductory leaflets for courses
* Invite P's to help teach peace careers
* Invite students
* Set policy for student helpers to be available to students each week by email
5. Support local economy
* Do maximum business with locally owned & operated businesses
* Identify & publicize such businesses
* Advise preparedness for economic depression and martial law
* Help start local cuop businesses to employ local young people
* Invest in L.O.O. businesses & organizations
* Promote alternative financing, such as barter, local currency etc
* Promote alternative education & careers
6. Do minimal business with big businesses & conventional colleges
* See list of big businesses to boycott at wearenotbuyingit.org
* See list at solari.com & wearenotbuyingit.org
* Promote alternative education & careers
* Have Hear-Win-Win Dialogs with college & big business owners & managers
7. Promote Peace to younger conservatives
* Teach peace career students to convert conservatives
* See freewebs.com/bilib & freewebs.com/2mop
* Use Hear-Win-Win procedure for the 2nd Best Way
* PMEC publish the dialog solutions
* 7.PMEC promote best anti-war arguments to conservative young people
* Make online videos
* Write to forums, blogs ...
* Answer neocon commentators
* Write Letters to Editors
Empower
December 8, 2008 by lloyd
HOW PMEC HELPS PEACE GROUPS
* Our new organization is tentatively called Peace Movement Empowerment Circle, or PMEC.
* We want to achieve permanent world peace and freedom quickly, within 5 years, because, if we don't do our best for peace soon, we may not get another chance. We may get another fascist president or dictator after Obama.
* We believe the best ways to peace are: organizing better than the war culture; unifying Progressives, Libertarians, Minorities et al; better supporting peace candidates; teaching peace careers instead of conventional careers; investing in local community; boycotting big business & conventional colleges; and converting younger Conservatives to peace.
*We want to help for free, because we want world peace, not money or power.
How PMEC Can Help Peace Groups & Supporters
* We can help:
*1 - increase membership via #6
*2 - improve group effectiveness via #7
*3 - unify diverse peace supporters, such as Progressives, Libertarians, Minorities et al via #4
*4 - teach simple unifying Hear to Win-Win Dialog
*5 - do strategic planning
*6 - plan easy, exciting events and fund-raisers
*7 - teach simple egalitarian unbeasting, meaning non-authoritarianism
* We can help:
*8 - suggest how to recruit and support peace candidates
*9 - suggest how to support legislators to fix laws to bolster peace & freedom
*10 - provide education for peace careers, such as:
*a -- Peace Philosophy & Communicating
*b -- Peace Activism & Campaigning
*c -- Co-operative Business
*d -- Natural Lifestyle
*e -- Eco-friendly Careers
* We can help:
*11 - support local community via #10c & #12
*12 - teach on survival & alternative economics
*13 - teach how to boycott war culture, esp. big business and conventional colleges
*14 - convert younger conservatives to support peace & freedom via #4
* Would your group like to ask someone to be a contact person to relay messages between your group and PMEC? This would make it easier for us to help your group.
* You may see our temporary website at http://pmec.lefora.com
* You may contact our local rep,
or email LKINDR@yahoo.com
or fill in our form
http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?key=poYZVVZT4tbS94nVLQtnZOg&hl=en
Prepare
December 7, 2008 by lloyd
Hope for the Best, But Prepare for the Worst
* Even after Obama is inaugurated, Bush's fascist friends may be intent on having martial law to gain more dictatorial powers and implement more fascist policies, including covert genocide.
* It seems it would be easy for them to obtain martial law. They could assassinate Obama and frame or set up some lone, white racist, like they did for Dr. King's murder. This would likely spark race wars, which would be an excuse for martial law. They could then use Blackwater in all cities where rioting occurs, like they did in New Orleans, and blockade the cities and not let food in. They could use the excuse that people are shooting at trucks bringing in food and those shooters could be their own agents. After a few days the people would start rioting for food, which could be used as an excuse to imprison more of the minority population.
* I've long been aware that there's extensive corruption in government and big business. But it wasn't until I read Len Horowitz's book, Emerging Viruses, AIDS & Ebola, in 1997, that I finally found convincing documentation of evidence of a major fascist conspiracy. He showed that U.S. big business, covert ops & the Vatican helped secretly bring Nazis to the U.S. and Latin America after WW2. The Nixon administration was supported by ex-Nazis and it promoted fascist policies, including research on immune system destroying pathogens for biological warfare, as well as imposing stringent economic policies on Africa, Asia and Latin America. See tetrahedron.org
* Many of his people and their co-thinkers stayed on under Ford, Carter, Reagan and the Bush's to carry out ever more secret research and more blatant fascist policies, the worst of all in the last Bush's administration. Many of the laws passed under Bush are illegal, but the courts are too corrupt to overthrow them. The Patriot Act and the Military Commissions Act make it possible for govt agents to kidnap anyone and hold them indefinitely, torture them and sentence them to death, if they want, without having to tell anyone what happened to them. The latter Act also makes it possible for the military to imprison civilians and force them to do slave labor.
* The world seems to be sighing with relief that fascists are finally going to be out of power in the U.S. and a non-fascist will be president now. But the fascists retain a lot of power via big business and their influences on Obama and his administration.
* We need to get all the fascist laws repealed asap. And people should prepare to try to prevent rioting and declaration of martial law. Large city residents should look now for places to go in the event of emergency. People should stock several months' supply of wheat, rye, beans etc. These should be frozen for a day or so in order to kill any small bugs or bug eggs. The wheat or rye is best used as sprouts, which make them complete protein.
* Young adults need to join progressive or libertarian political or peace groups and get their support to run for public office, like Obama did. It's not too early to prepare for the 2010 elections. City and county boards and other local positions may be available earlier.
* By the way, don't use cell phones, or if you have to, use the speaker phone setting, or use other safety precautions. Brain cancer etc is beginning to skyrocket worldwide from cellphones. Many countries are beginning to put warnings or restrictions on them, but the U.S. media suppresses such info. Dr. Mercola said Johnny Cochran was constantly on his cell phone and that's likely what caused his brain tumor and early death. See http://freewebs.com/emr2
