Lefora Free Forum
Join now
Making Peace Culture Better Organized and Stronger than War & Greed Culture
67 views

New Laws

Page 1
posts 1–4 of 4
novice - founder
38 posts

MESSAGE SENT TO SEVERAL PEACE YAHOOGROUPS (moments ago)
(See more detailed version following the simple version here.)
I think the peace movement would be greatly empowered if diverse peace supporters would seek unity by understanding each others' concerns. So below I state what seem to be some of the main concerns of various groups. And after that I propose what laws we should perhaps ask peace candidates to agree to promote, once elected by our support, which laws may be agreeable to all peace supporters. I welcome comments to LKINDR@yahoo.com yahoo.com.

Differences between Progressives, Libertarians et al
* A major difference between Progressives and Libertarians is that Progressives regard the governments within the U.S. as organizations properly intended to be of the people, by the people and for the people, whereas Libertarians regard these governments as usurpers of the people's power and abusers of the people's freedoms.
* A concern of Progressives is that reducing government power, as Libertarians favor, would leave the powerless defenseless against organized abusers.
* A concern of Libertarians is that governments tend to be the worst abusers.
* What potential solutions would satisfy both parties' concerns?
* Most Libertarians might be satisfied if there were ways to prevent governments' abuses and infringements on freedoms.
* Most Progressives might be satisfied if there were some way to protect the most powerless from organized abusers.
* So how can we organize so as to defend the most powerless and prevent defenders from becoming abusers of power?
1. We can unite to recruit & elect peace candidates who share Progressives', Libertarians', Minorities' et al concerns.
2. We can recruit, if we prefer, only candidates who agree with and agree to follow our plan.
3. A plan for our candidate lawmakers could be as follows.
(See more detailed plan at pmec.lefora.com/...)
3:1. Re UNJUST WAR: __favored by all Peace Supporters__
Forbid pre-emptive and unjust war by requiring a fair and speedy trial to governments accused of threatening our national security.
3:2. Re UNJUST LAWS: __favored by all__
Forbid unconstitutional lawmaking and repeal all unconstitutional laws, including esp. FISA, the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act and the Federal Reserve Act.
3:3. Re SECRECY: __favored by Progressives & Libertarians__
Require that all government covert operations and the funds used for them be disclosed to each state government and each state grand jury.
3:4. Re TAXES: __favored by Libertarians__
Outlaw all taxation, but allow voluntary fees for gov't services etc.
3:5. Re POSSESSION: __favored by Libertarians, Minorities & Progressives__
Forbid the outlawing of possessions, but require restrictions on use of dangerous possessions solely to insure public safety. Release from prison all who were charged solely with violating laws found to be unjust, such as possession laws.
3:6. Re POLLUTION: __favored by Environmentalists & Progressives__
Require finding and fining anyone who produces anything that significantly endangers public safety and the biosphere.
3:7. Re TRADE: __favored by Progressives__
Require finding and fining or deporting anyone who trades significantly with anyone in an imperialist nation, which endangers our national security.
3:8. Re TRAVEL: __favored by Libertarians__
Forbid mandating of driver's licenses and insurance, except on those who use public roads to transport people or freight for fees. Forbid outlawing foreigners from traveling in the U.S., except those known to be threats to national security.
3:9. Re RIGHTS: __favored by Progressives & Libertarians__
Require acknowledgement of all human rights for everyone in the U.S., regardless of citizenship.
3:10. Re POVERTY: __favored by Progressives & Minorities__
Require acknowledgement of everyone's right to equal access to land to grow enough food etc for survival, or to just compensation from those using excess land.
3:11. Re NATIONAL SECURITY: __favored by Conservatives__
Require finding security threats everywhere in the world, especially among governments & organized groups, and require licensed media to make them known to the public and require requesting each of the accused to attend a fair, convenient & speedy public trial to clear them of the accusation of being threats.

The Plan for our Lawmakers in greater detail: Let's ask them to Make these laws:
3:1. Re UNJUST WAR: Outlaw pre-emptive and unjust war by requiring that, in order to declare war for more than one month, the government must provide a fair and speedy trial to the opposing government, accused of being a threat to our national security. Require making treaties that forbid all governments and their residents from making and using dangerous weapons.
3:2a. Re UNJUST LAWS: Forbid lawmakers to pass laws that violate the Constitution. Require all bills be approved by grand juries in all 50 states before making them laws. At the same time, require that grand juries be fully informed of their rights as juries, similar to Miranda requirements on police re arrestees. Require that methods of selecting grand jury members be constitutional.
3:2b. Require that all previous statutes also be reviewed by grand juries to determine constitutionality and those found unconstitutional to be repealed. (This would guarantee that FISA, the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act, the Federal Reserve Act etc will be repealed.)
3:3a. Re SECRECY: Require that all government covert operations be fully disclosed to all branches of each state government and a grand jury in each state and every expenditure by the government be audited.
3:3b. Also forbid awarding government contracts to anyone without fair bidding.
3:4. Re TAXES: Forbid the government from imposing taxes on anyone, but require fees to be charged for services rendered to recipients who voluntarily request such services. Forbid mandating of driver's licenses and insurance, except on those who use public roads to transport people or freight for fees. Forbid outlawing foreigners from traveling in the U.S., except those known to be threats to national security. Acknowledge every adult's right to own a vehicle and to drive it on public roadways, with no restrictions, but those scientifically proven to be effective, solely for public safety. Acknowledge that, because everyone has the right to live and life requires land on which to grow food, everyone in the U.S. will be allowed access to 7 acres of land for survival. Anyone using more than 7 acres for oneself will be charged a fair rental fee, to be dispersed equally among the public.
3:5. Re POSSESSION: Forbid the government from outlawing possession of any object or substance, but require government to put restrictions on such possession, solely to insure public safety. Require that all people imprisoned for violating unjust laws be released asap. Require that Grand Juries be assembled to review all prison procedures to guarantee that prisoners are not abused by staff or other prisoners and that scientifically proven methods of reform are strongly promoted to prisoners.
3:6-11. Use Grand Juries to determine proper fines and restrictions to be imposed.

Conservatives' vs. Liberals' Concerns
* A concern of Conservatives is that Liberals' desire for peace, by opposing pre-emptive war and reducing defense spending, jeopardizes our national defense, so that terrorists and illegal immigrants will increasingly threaten our security and freedom.
* A concern of Liberals is that Neocons over-emphasize security and exaggerate or lie about threats from terrorism as a smokescreen to hide their true motives of greed and lust for power and that the laws and policies they promote, including pre-emptive war, are the greatest threats to our freedom and security. Some even suspect that our own or our allies' covert operations are the real organizers or facilitators of some terrorism.

__________________
Good Day
novice - founder
38 posts

OBSTACLES TO PEACE
What are the main obstacles to world peace?
1. Obstacle #1 seems to be the ruling class, which manipulates and divides people against each other to increase its own power and reduce the numbers of the lower classes. They apparently give secret donations to extremists and help them disseminate their divisive propaganda. They help arm opposing extremist groups and secretly encourage them to fight against each other.
2. Obstacle #2 seems to be hateful religions, which promote domination of people and restrictions on freedom of thought and expression and sometimes racism and genocide.
3. Obstacle #3 seems to be governments, which seek to establish or secure a ruling class to dominate the lower classes.

What are likely to be the best ways to overcome these obstacles?
1. Have win-win dialog with the ruling class, religious leaders & government leaders, or with their major supporters.
2. Expose their machinations.
3. Use true propaganda to divide them against each other.
4. Pray thanking God for dividing members of the ruling class and their major supporters against each other, so that they lose their power over the lower classes. Pray also thanking God for revealing love to them and to all asap.

__________________
Good Day
novice - founder
38 posts

REPLY TO CINDY SHEEHAN
* I just replied to Cindy Sheehan's appeal for donations and other help to keep her campaign office open. Here's my reply.

* It looks like you need 48,000 votes or more to get elected [in 2010], assuming a popular Republican doesn't help you by cutting into Pelosi's vote. So you don't really need any money at all. You need a few thousand volunteers to help persuade 48,000 voters to vote for you.
* If you want to build a culture of world peace and freedom, not just win an election, you should use win-win dialog with voters. You ask them what their main political concerns are. You tell them what you think they said are their concerns. When they acknowledge that you understand their concerns, you briefly mention your main concerns, then ask them if they can think of potential solutions that may satisfy both sides' concerns. If they think of something, write it down. If you think of something, tell them your idea and see what they think.
* You can ask your volunteers to do that too. If you have 5,000 volunteers starting in early 2010 or a little earlier, each one needs to persuade about 10 Pelosi voters to vote for you. They'll each have 10 months to persuade 10 people. If you get 10,000 volunteers, they'll need only persuade 5 voters each in 10 months.
* Your volunteers should ask for the email IDs and or phone #s of Pelosi voters, so you can remind them once a month what your proposals are. You should also encourage them to mention any main concerns they may not have thought of previously. Anyway, the reminders may be needed so people who were persuaded to vote for you earlier don't forget by election time. This may be elementary, but I may have to tell other new candidates the same thing in coming months.

* I've started working on legislation proposals that I think may satisfy many voters' concerns at
http://pmec.lefora.com/2008/12/16/unify/page1. I think peace candidates should support something like those proposals; and their supporters should help improve the proposals. Working on such win-win types of legislation proposals should help build the culture of peace that we long for. Yes, no?

__________________
Good Day
novice - founder
38 posts

HOW TO REDUCE GOVT
HOW TO HAVE EFFICIENT GOVERNMENT AGENCIES: A budgeting proposal
Herb - Dec 23rd, 2008 at 10:44 am - http://solari.com/blog/?p=1929
- There is a way to cut almost any state agency or department in half in about three years, with employees cooperating enthusiastically and willingly.
- Most government agencies propose their own budgets for each fiscal year, and each new one is almost always larger than the current budget. Most agencies make sure that the current year’s budget has been spent by the end of the fiscal year. They don’t want to lose their funding. There is no incentive for savings under this system.
- There should be a new budgeting policy for each department that would take any unspent, budgeted funds at the end of the fiscal year and split them among the people in the department. Then, the lower budget figure would be used for the next fiscal year, with, again, any unspent surplus being distributed to the employees who made the surplus possible. Personal interest would have every employee watching for any possible waste. Retiring employees would not be replaced, and hiring of new personnel would be almost eliminated.
- No money would be saved the first year, but after that, every department would have continuously lower budgets.

__________________
Good Day
Page 1
posts 1–4 of 4

This Topic Is Locked To Guest Posts

It's been a while since this topic was active, if you'd like to get it going again, please post as a registered member

join now